Production
https://prod.org.br/article/doi/10.1590/S0103-65132014005000022
Production
Article

Contradiction analysis: towards a dialectical approach in ergonomics field interventions

Nathanael, Dimitris; Zarboutis, Nikos; Marmaras, Nicolas

Downloads: 0
Views: 908

Abstract

The present paper is a methodological contribution to the ergonomics field intervention process. It proposes a perspective on work analysis based on the dialectics notion of contradictions. Contradiction analysis is proposed as being complementary to more established work decomposition methods. The aim of including such an analysis is to frame various heterogeneous determinants of a work activity in practical terms, swiftly and in a manner that preserves its multifaceted unity and essence. Such framing is of particular value when considering alternative design solutions because it provides a practical means for anticipating the effects and side effects of proposed changes. The proposed method is inspired by two theoretical constructs: (i) contradiction, as used in Cultural Historical Activity Theory, and (ii) regulation, as developed and used by the francophone tradition of the ergonomics of activity. Two brief examples of its use are presented, and its usefulness, possible pitfalls and need for further developments are discussed.

Keywords

Work design & organization. Action research. Macroergonomics. Activity theory

References



De La Garza, C., & Weill-Fassina, A. (2000). Régulations horizontales et verticales du risque. In A. Weill-Fassina & T. H. Benchekroun (Eds), Approches ergonomiques du travail collectif dans les systèmes socio-techniques (pp. 271-234). Toulouse: Octares.

Dejours, C. (1995). Le facteur humain. Paris: PUF.

Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: an activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit Oy.

Faverge, J.-M. (1966). L'analyse du travail en termes de régulation. In J.-M. Faverge, M. Olivier, J. Delahaut, P. Stephaneck & J. C. Falmagne, L'ergonomie des processus industriels (pp. 33-60). Bruxelles: Éditions de l'Institut de Sociologie.

Guerin, F., Laville, A., Daniellou, F., Duraffourg, J., & Kerguelen, A. (2007). Understanding and transforming work: the practice of ergonomics. Ed. ANACT.

Hoffman, R. R., & Woods, D. D. (2011). Beyond Simon's Slice: Five Fundamental Trade-Offs that Bound the Performance of Macrocognitive Work Systems. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 26(6), 67-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2011.97

Hollnagel, E. (2009). The ETTO Principle: Efficiency-thoroughness trade-off: Why things that go right sometimes go wrong. London: Ashgate.

Johansson, B., Rask, K., & Stenberg, M. (2010). Piece rates and their effects on health and safety - A literature review. Applied Ergonomics, 41(4), 607-614. PMid:20106469. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2009.12.020

Leplat, J. (2000). L'analyse psychologique de l'activité en ergonomie. Toulouse: Octarès. PMid:10976864.

Meister, D. (1999). The History of Human Factors and Ergonomics. Mahwah: Erlbaum.

Montmollin, M. (1999). Analysis and models of operators activities in complex natural life environments. Produção, 9(spe), 29-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-65131999000400002

Nardi, B. A. (1996). Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-computer Interaction (pp. 1-20). Cambridge: MIT Press.

Nathanael, D., & Marmaras, N. (2005). Historical analysis as a means to uncover the dynamics of evolving practices. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the European Association of Cognitive Ergonomics, Chania.

Nathanael, D., & Marmaras, N. (2008). On the development of work practices: a constructivist model. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 9(5), 359-382. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14639220701596706

Rasmussen, J., Pejtersen, A. M., & Goodstein, L. P. (1994). Cognitive Systems Engineering. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Sperandio, J. C. (1972). Charge de travail et régulation des processus opératoires. Le Travail Humain, 35, 85-93.

Waters, T. R., Pulz-Anderson, V., Garg, A., & Fine, L. G. (1993). Revised NIOSH equation for the design and evaluation of manual lifting tasks. Ergonomics, 36, 749-776. PMid:8339717. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140139308967940

Wilde, L. (1992). Logic: Dialectic and Contradiction. In T. Carver (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Marx. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wilson J. R. (2012). Fundamentals of systems ergonomics. Work, 41, 3861-3868. PMid:22317311.

Wisner, A. (1995). Understanding problem Building: ergonomic work analysis. Ergonomics, 38(3), 595-605. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140139508925133

Wright, P. C., Pocock, S., & Fields, R. E. (1998). The prescription and practice of work on the flight deck. In Proceedings of the Ninth European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics, Limerick.

Woods, D. D. (2009). Escaping Failures of Foresight. Safety Science, 47, 498-501. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2008.07.030
5883a4547f8c9da00c8b489f production Articles
Links & Downloads

Production

Share this page
Page Sections