Thematic Section - Future of Energy-efficient Operations and Production Systems

Barriers to broaden the electricity production from biomass and biogas in Brazil

Margareth de Cássia Oliveira Pavan; Dorel Soares Ramos; Munir Yones Soares; Clara Barufi; Marly Monteiro de Carvalho

Downloads: 0
Views: 6


Paper aims: The research aims to identify the main barriers to scaling up the energy production expansion systems from biogas and biomass in Brazil.

Originality: This article aggregates information and different perceptions from a systemic view for bioelectricity production from biomass. It brings to the fore the discussion of bioenergy production from other types of biomass, which encompass a wide range of actors in the production chain.

Research method: We adopted a qualitative approach by applying semi-structured interviews with 19 experts from 15 institutions considering various biomass and biogas power generation segments.

Main findings: This paper identifies five barrier categories that restrain or affect the country’s broad electricity production from biomass and biogas: circumstantial, cultural, technical, and include other uses of biogas and biomethane. The financial and cultural barriers are the most mentioned by the experts. Financial difficulties of the plants, sector conservatism, issues in the electricity sector, and lack of knowledge limit the potential and interest in developing new projects.

Implications for theory and practice: The results contribute to the development of sectoral public policies as it brings up non-explicit information and reveals broad perspectives aimed at integrating the themes of biogas and biomass. Also, the research adds to the debate on the analysis boundaries of this theme and can support future empirical studies in developing countries that seek to expand renewable sources to power generation from biomass.


Biomass, Biogas, Barriers, Sugarcane, Bioelectricity


Agência Nacional do Petróleo, Gás Natural e Biocombustíveis – ANP. (2020). RenovaBio. Retrieved in 2020, March 20, from

Banja, M., Sikkema, R., Jégard, M., Motola, V., & Dallemand, J. F. (2019). Biomass for energy in the EU - The support framework. Energy Policy, 131, 215-228.

Bizzo, W. A. (2017). Analysis of energy consumption in three systems for collecting sugarcane straw for use in power generation. Energy, 119, 178-187.

Câmara de Comercialização de Energia Elétrica – CCEE. (2021a). Electric energy trading. Retrieved in 2021, August 5, from

Câmara de Comercialização de Energia Elétrica – CCEE. (2021b). Electric energy trading. Retrieved in 2021, August 5, from from

Christofoletti, C. A., Escher, J. P., Correia, J. E., Marinho, J. F. U., & Fontanetti, C. S. (2013). Sugarcane vinasse: Environmental implications of its use. Waste Management (New York, N.Y.), 33(12), 2752-2761. PMid:24084103.

Dapeng, L., & Weiwei, W. (2009). Barriers and incentives of CCS deployment in China: results from semi-structured interviews. Energy Policy, 37(6), 2421-2432.

Donner, M., Gohier, R., & de Vries, H. (2020). A new circular business model typology for creating value from agro-waste. The Science of the Total Environment, 716, 137065. PMid:32044489.

Dutra, J., & Rodrigues, M. D. L. (2019). Distribuição de gás natural no Brasil: dados e aspectos regulatórios. São Paulo: FGV- Centros de Estudos em Regulação e Infraestrutura.

Empresa de Pesquisa Energética – EPE. (2020). Plano Decenal de Expansão de Energia 2029 (393 p.). Rio de Janeiro: MME/EPE. Retrieved in 2020, February 22, from

Empresa de Pesquisa Energética – EPE. (2021). Brazilian Energy Balance 2021 Year 2020 (292 p.). Rio de Janeiro: MME/EPE.

Ferraresi, A. G. J., & Calia, R. C. (2019). As barreiras de ampliação da bioeletricidade sucroenergética no Brasil: propostas políticas e econômicas para o setor. Caderno de Administração, 26(2), 75.

Frick, F. (2018). Efeito da adição fraccionada de bolo de filtro na digestão anaeróbica da vinhaça (Dissertação de mestrado). Universidade Federal do Paraná, Palotina.

Hughes, N., Mutran, V. M., Tomei, J., de Oliveira Ribeiro, C., & Oller do Nascimento, C. A. (2020). Strength in diversity? Past dynamics and future drivers affecting demand for sugar, ethanol, biogas and bioelectricity from Brazil’s sugarcane sector. Biomass and Bioenergy, 141, 105676.

Janke, L., Leite, A., Nikolausz, M., Schmidt, T., Liebetrau, J., Nelles, M., & Stinner, W. (2015). Biogas production from sugarcane waste: assessment on kinetic challenges for process designing. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 16(9), 20685-20703. PMid:26404248.

Leal, M. R. L. V., Galdos, M. V., Scarpare, F. V., Seabra, J. E. A., Walter, A., & Oliveira, C. O. F. (2013). Sugarcane straw availability, quality, recovery and energy use: a literature review. Biomass and Bioenergy, 53, 11-19.

López González, L. M., Pereda Reyes, I., Dewulf, J., Budde, J., Heiermann, M., & Vervaeren, H. (2014). Effect of liquid hot water pre-treatment on sugarcane press mud methane yield. Bioresource Technology, 169, 284-290. PMid:25062540.

López González, L. M., Vervaeren, H., Pereda Reyes, I., Dumoulin, A., Romero Romero, O., & Dewulf, J. (2013). Thermo-chemical pre-treatment to solubilise and improve anaerobic biodegradability of press mud. Bioresource Technology, 131, 250-257. PMid:23353040.

Lune, H., & Berg, B. L. (2017). Methods for the social sciences, publications global edition (240 p.). England: Pearson Publication.

Mariani, L. (2018). Biogás: diagnóstico e propostas de ações para incentivar seu uso no Brasil (Tese de doutorado). Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas. Retrieved in 2020, February 20, from

Marvasti, B. A. (2004). Qualitative research in sociology: an introduction (169 p.). London: Sage Publication.

Mathias, M. C. P. P., & Mathias, J. F. C. M. (2015). Biogas in Brazil: a governmental Agenda. Journal of Energy and Power Engineering, 9(1), 1-15.

MegaWhat. (2019). A-6 auction: price per source. Retrieved in 2020, February 20, from

Mittal, S., Ahlgren, E. O., & Shukla, P. R. (2018). Barriers to biogas dissemination in India: a review. Energy Policy, 112, 361-370.

Moraes, B. S., Junqueira, T. L., Pavanello, L. G., Cavalett, O., Mantelatto, P. E., Bonomi, A., & Zaiat, M. (2014). Anaerobic digestion of vinasse from sugarcane biorefineries in Brazil from energy, environmental, and economic perspectives: Profit or expense? Applied Energy, 113, 825-835.

Nadaleti, W. C., Lourenço, V. A., Belli Filho, P., Dos Santos, G. B., & Przybyla, G. (2020). National potential production of methane and electrical energy from sugarcane vinasse in Brazil: a thermo-economic analysis. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 8(2), 103422.

Neves, L. (2018). How to deliver at lower prices. Brasil Energia. Retrieved in 2020, January 20, from

Pope, C., & Ziebland, S. N. M. (2017). Qualitative research in health care - Analysing qualitative data. In J. E. Leestma, G. Harding, & K. M. G. Taylor (Eds.), Pharmacy practice (2nd ed., pp. 455-466).

Ramos, C. S. (2019). Endividamento das usinas cresceu em 2018/19. Valor Econômico. Retrieved in 2019, November 13, from

Sales, C. J. D., & Hochstetler, R. L. (2018). A crise do GSF: definição de Garantia Física de novas hidrelétricas (Partes I e II). Rio de Janeiro: Agência Canal Energia. Retrieved in 2021, August 8, from

União da Indústria de Cana-de-Açúcar – UNICA. (2019). A bioeletricidade da cana. Retrieved in 2020, Februay 20, from

União da Indústria de Cana-de-Açúcar – UNICA. (2020). Bioelectricity. Retrieved in 2020, March 31, from

Submitted date:

Accepted date:

619f827ea9539547ec5bf002 production Articles
Links & Downloads


Share this page
Page Sections