Research Article

Proposal for an analytical model of materiality in the Global Reporting Initiative Standards reports

Igor Laguna Vieira; Elmo Rodrigues da Silva; Luiz Carlos de Martini Junior; Luis Alberto Duncan Rangel

Downloads: 0
Views: 48


Paper aims: This study proposes, applies, and discusses a model based on the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method with the objective of assessing the issue of materiality of sustainability reports in the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) model of civil construction companies.

Originality: The published literature contains few studies that propose quantitative models for the assessment of materiality for sustainability reports. To address this data gap, the present research suggests new paths.

Research method: After the hierarchical structure of the model had been developed, specialists were asked to prioritize the criteria and sub-criteria in their orders of preference. Their decisions were collected through a questionnaire and the responses were included in the model using the individual aggregation of priorities method applied to the AHP.

Main findings: It was concluded that there is scope for improving the quality of sustainability reports, as there are companies that fail to disclose relevant topics according to the judgment of the specialists consulted in this study.

Implications for theory and practice: The AHP method with absolute measurement proved to be an efficient model, mainly because it allows for weighting of criteria and sub-criteria, demonstrating that it is useful for comparing the materiality of company reports.


Multi-criteria decision making, Construction sector, Analytic hierarchy process, GRI, Sustainable development


Ameh, O. J., & Odusami, K. T. (2010). Professionals’ ambivalence toward ethics in the Nigerian Construction Industry. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 136(1), 9-16.

Ameyaw, E. E., Pärn, E., Chan, A. P. C., Owusu-Manu, D.-G., Edwards, D. J., & Darko, A. (2017). Corrupt practices in the construction industry: survey of Ghanaian Experience. Journal of Management Engineering, 33(6), 5017006.

Bellantuono, N., Pontrandolfo, P., & Scozzi, B. (2016). Capturing the Stakeholders’ View in sustainability reporting: a novel approach. Sustainability, 8(4), 379.

Boral, S., Howard, I., Chaturvedi, S. K., McKee, K., & Naikan, V. N. A. (2020). A novel hybrid multi-criteria group decision making approach for failure mode and effect analysis: An essential requirement for sustainable manufacturing. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 21, 14-32.

Brooks, C., & Oikonomou, I. (2018). The effects of environmental, social and governance disclosures and performance on firm value: A review of the literature in accounting and finance. The British Accounting Review, 50(1), 1-15.

Calabrese, A., Costa, R., & Rosati, F. (2015). A feedback-based model for CSR assessment and materiality analysis. Accounting Forum, 39(4), 312-327.

Calabrese, A., Costa, R., Levialdi, N., & Menichini, T. (2016). A fuzzy analytic hierarchy process method to support materiality assessment in sustainability reporting. Journal of Cleaner Production, 121, 248-264.

Calabrese, A., Costa, R., Levialdi, N., & Menichini, T. (2019). Materiality analysis in sustainability reporting: a tool for directing corporate sustainability towards emerging economic, environmental and social opportunities. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 25(5), 1016-1038.

Cegan, J. C., Filion, A. M., Keisler, J. M., & Linkov, I. (2017). Trends and applications of multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: literature review. Environment Systems & Decisions, 37(2), 123-133.

Choudhury, S., Saha, A. K., & Majumder, M. (2020). Optimal location selection for installation of surface water treatment plant by Gini coefficient-based analytical hierarchy process. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 22(5), 4073-4099.

Costa, R., & Menichini, T. (2013). A multidimensional approach for CSR assessment: The importance of the stakeholder perception. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(1), 150-161.

Durbach, I. N., & Stewart, T. J. (2012). Modeling uncertainty in multi-criteria decision analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 223(1), 1-14.

Ecorys. (2014). Resource efficiency in the building sector: final report. Rotterdam: Copenhagen Resource Institute.

Edgley, C., Jones, M. J., & Atkins, J. (2015). The adoption of the materiality concept in social and environmental reporting assurance: A field study approach. The British Accounting Review, 47(1), 1-18.

Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. Oxford: Capstone.

Expert Choice®. (2004). Expert Choice® Resource Aligner (Version 11). [Computer software]. Arlington: Expert Choice®, Inc.

Global Reporting Initiative. (2013). G4 Sustainability reporting guidelines. Amsterdam: GRI.

Global Reporting Initiative. (2016). GRI 101: Foundation 2016. Amsterdam: GRI.

Global Reporting Initiative. (2018). G4 to Standards: Transition complete. Retrieved in 2020, March 14, from

Global Reporting Initiative. (2020). GRI’s History. Retrieved in 2020, March 14, from's%20history.aspx

Global Reporting Initiative. (2021a). About sustainability reporting. Retrieved in 2020, March 13, from

Global Reporting Initiative. (2021b). Sustainability disclosure database. Retrieved in 2020, March 13, from

Govindan, K., Diabat, A., & Madan Shankar, K. (2015a). Analyzing the drivers of green manufacturing with fuzzy approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 96, 182-193.

Govindan, K., Rajendran, S., Sarkis, J., & Murugesan, P. (2015b). Multi criteria decision making approaches for green supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 98, 66-83.

Gunduz, M., & Önder, O. (2013). Corruption and Internal Fraud in the Turkish Construction Industry. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19(2), 505-528. PMid:22371033.

Kucukvar, M., Noori, M., Egilmez, G., & Tatari, O. (2014). Stochastic decision modeling for sustainable pavement designs. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 19(6), 1185-1199.

Lai, A., Melloni, G., & Stacchezzini, R. (2017). What does materiality mean to integrated reporting preparers? An empirical exploration. Meditari Accountancy Research, 25(4), 533-552.

Liu, B., Zhang, L., Sun, J., Wang, D., Liu, C., Luther, M., & Xu, Y. (2020). Composition of energy outflows embodied in the gross exports of the construction sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 248, 119296.

Man, Y., Han, Y., Liu, Y., Lin, R., & Ren, J. (2020). Multi-criteria decision making for sustainability assessment of boxboard production: A life cycle perspective considering water consumption, energy consumption, GHG emissions, and internal costs. Journal of Environmental Management, 255, 109860. PMid:31759200.

Mancini, L., & Sala, S. (2018). Social impact assessment in the mining sector: Review and comparison of indicators frameworks. Resources Policy, 57, 98-111.

Manzardo, A., Ren, J., Piantella, A., Mazzi, A., Fedele, A., & Scipioni, A. (2014). Integration of water footprint accounting and costs for optimal chemical pulp supply mix in paper industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 72, 167-173.

Martin-Utrillas, M., Reyes-Medina, M., Curiel-Esparza, J., & Canto-Perello, J. (2014). Hybrid method for selection of the optimal process of leachate treatment in waste treatment and valorization plants or landfills. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 17(4), 873-885.

Moggi, S. (2019). Social and environmental reports at universities: a Habermasian view on their evolution. Accounting Forum, 43(3), 283-326.

Mohammed, A. (2020). Towards “gresilient” supply chain management: A quantitative study. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 155, 104641.

Ocampo, L. A. (2018). Correction to: Applying fuzzy AHP–TOPSIS technique in identifying the content strategy of sustainable manufacturing for food production. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 21(6), 3121-3122.

Petrillo, A., Carotenuto, P., Baffo, I., & De Felice, F. (2017). A web-based multiple criteria decision support system for evaluation analysis of carpooling. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 20(5), 2321-2341.

Poghosyan, A., Manu, P., Mahamadu, A.-M., Akinade, O., Mahdjoubi, L., Gibb, A., & Behm, M. (2020). A web-based design for occupational safety and health capability maturity indicator. Safety Science, 122, 104516.

Rahman, M., Islam, R., Wan Husain, W. R., & Ahmad, K. (2019). Developing a hierarchical model to enhance business excellence in hotel industry of Bangladesh. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 31(4), 1836-1856.

Ramanathan, R., & Ganesh, L. S. (1994). Group preference aggregation methods employed in AHP: An evaluation and an intrinsic process for deriving members’ weightages. European Journal of Operational Research, 79(2), 249-265.

Reimsbach, D., Schiemann, F., Hahn, R., & Schmiedchen, E. (2019). In the Eyes of the Beholder: Experimental Evidence on the Contested Nature of Materiality in Sustainability Reporting. Organization & Environment, 33(4), 624-651.

Saad, M. H., Nazzal, M. A., & Darras, B. M. (2019). A general framework for sustainability assessment of manufacturing processes. Ecological Indicators, 97, 211-224.

Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Saaty, T. L. (2006). Rank from comparisons and from ratings in the analytic hierarchy/network processes. European Journal of Operational Research, 168(2), 557-570.

Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83.

Safari, M., & Areeb, A. (2020). A qualitative analysis of GRI principles for defining sustainability report quality: an Australian case from the preparers’ perspective. Accounting Forum, 44(4), 1-32.

Schlickmann, M. N., Ferreira, J. C. E., & Pereira, A. C. (2020). Method for assessing the obsolescence of manufacturing equipment based on the triple bottom line. Production, 30, e20190003.

Schmeltz, L. (2014). Introducing value-based framing as a strategy for communicating CSR. Social Responsibility Journal, 10(1), 184-206.

Simanaviciene, R., & Ustinovichius, L. (2010). Sensitivity Analysis for Multiple Criteria Decision Making Methods: TOPSIS and SAW. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(6), 7743-7744.

Spangenberg, J. H. (2016). Hot Air or Comprehensive Progress? A Critical Assessment of the SDGs. Sustainable Development, 25(4), 311-321.

Talbot, D., & Boiral, O. (2018). GHG Reporting and Impression Management: an assessment of sustainability reports from the energy sector. Journal of Business Ethics, 147(2), 367-383.

Tramarico, C. L., Karpak, B., Salomon, V. A. P., da Silveira, C. A. M., & Marins, F. A. S. (2019). Multi-criteria analysis of professional education on supply chain management. Production, 29, e20180087.

Trinh, M. T., Feng, Y., & Mohamed, S. (2019). Framework for measuring resilient safety culture in Vietnam’s Construction Environment. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 145(2), 4018127.

United Nations. (2015). Transforming Our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. New York: UN.

Wagner, R., & Seele, P. (2017). Uncommitted deliberation? Discussing Regulatory Gaps by Comparing GRI 3.1 to GRI 4.0 in a Political CSR Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 146(2), 333-351.

Wicher, P., Zapletal, F., & Lenort, R. (2019). Sustainability performance assessment of industrial corporation using Fuzzy Analytic Network Process. Journal of Cleaner Production, 241, 118132.

Willmott Dixon. (2010). The Impacts of Construction and the Built Environment. Retrieved in 2020, March 14, from

World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our Common Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Yan, H.-B., & Ma, T. (2015). A group decision-making approach to uncertain quality function deployment based on fuzzy preference relation and fuzzy majority. European Journal of Operational Research, 241(3), 815-829.

Yu, A., Jia, Z., Zhang, W., Deng, K., & Herrera, F. (2020). A dynamic credit index system for TSMEs in China using the Delphi and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Methods. Sustainability, 12(5), 1715.

Zhao, B., Tang, T., & Ning, B. (2016). Applying hybrid decision-making method based on Fuzzy AHP-WOWA operator for emergency alternative evaluation of unattended train operation metro system. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2016, 1-12.

Ziout, A., Azab, A., Altarazi, S., & ElMaraghy, W. H. (2013). Multi-criteria decision support for sustainability assessment of manufacturing system reuse. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 6(1), 59-69.

Submitted date:

Accepted date:

60c9feffa9539579de71f392 production Articles
Links & Downloads


Share this page
Page Sections