Production
https://prod.org.br/journal/production/article/doi/10.1590/0103-6513.20220090
Production
Research Article

Multicriteria negotiation model for selecting sustainable suppliers’ problem in the agribusiness

Over Manuel Montes Causil; Danielle Costa Morais

Downloads: 1
Views: 286

Abstract

Paper aims: The objective of this research is to propose a multicriteria negotiation model for selecting a sustainable packaging supplier in the food industry. The model aims to minimize the environmental, social and economic impacts of the production process of plastic while ensuring the operational criteria of packaging.

Originality: Despite the high number of scientific research using multicriteria decision-making suggested to select a supplier, the proposed negotiation model is innovative as it includes green manufacturing as a criterion for negotiation, alongside price and delivery time, to promote sustainable supply chain management.

Research method: The research method involves three stages: pre-negotiation, negotiation (based on FITradeoff), and post-agreement. The proposed model is illustrated using a case study of a Colombian slaughterhouse that needs to select a sustainable packaging supplier for the next two years.

Main findings: The main findings indicate that the proposed model that uses the FITradeoff for negotiation solves the problem of selecting sustainable packaging suppliers while promoting sustainable supply chain management in the agribusiness sector.

Implications for theory and practice: The model has implications for both theory and practice. It encourages interdependent companies to collaborate and enhances efficiency in greener terms for supply chains, buyer and seller firms. The proposition of an original integrative negotiation protocol for selecting sustainable suppliers in agribusiness can provide enterprises with a set of negotiation parameters to achieve successful sustainable supply chain management.

Keywords

Multicriteria negotiation model, Decision support, Food supply chain, FITradeoff procedure

References

Almeida, A. T., Almeida, J. A., Costa, A. P. C. S., & Almeida-Filho, A. T. (2016). A new method for elicitation of criteria weights in additive models: flexible and interactive tradeoff. European Journal of Operational Research, 250(1), 179-191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.08.058.

Banaeian, N., Mobli, H., Fahimnia, B., Nielsen, I. E., & Omid, M. (2018). Green supplier selection using fuzzy group decision making methods: a case study from the agri-food industry. Computers & Operations Research, 89, 337-347. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2016.02.015.

Bhutta, K. S., & Huq, F. (2002). Supplier selection problem: a comparison of the total cost of ownership and analytic hierarchy process approaches. Supply Chain Management, 7(3), 126-135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13598540210436586.

Bichler, M., Kersten, G., & Strecker, S. (2003). Towards a structured design of electronic negotiations. Group Decision and Negotiation, 12(4), 311-335. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1024867820235.

Camargo, F. G. (2023). A hybrid novel method to economically evaluate the carbon dioxide emissions in the productive chain of Argentina. Production, 33, e20220053. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0103-6513.20220053.

Causil, O. M. M., & Morais, D. C. (2023). Food supplier sorting model for strategic supply chain sustainable development. Business Strategy and the Environment, 1-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bse.3356. In press.

Demir, L., Akpınar, M. E., Araz, C., & Ilgın, M. A. (2018). A green supplier evaluation system based on a new multi-criteria sorting method: VIKORSORT. Expert Systems with Applications, 114, 479-487. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.07.071.

Faratin, P., Sierra, C., & Jennings, N. R. (1998). Negotiation decision functions for autonomous agents. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 24(3-4), 159-182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8890(98)00029-3.

Fiedler, A. (2022). An agent-based negotiation protocol for supply chain finance. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 168, 108136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2022.108136.

Frej, E. A., Almeida, A. T., & Costa, A. P. C. S. (2019). Using data visualization for ranking alternatives with partial information and interactive tradeoff elicitation. Operations Research, 19(4), 909-931. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12351-018-00444-2.

Frej, E. A., Morais, D. C., & Almeida, A. T. (2022). Negotiation support through interactive dominance relationship specification. Group Decision and Negotiation, 31(3), 591-620. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10726-021-09761-y.

Frej, E. A., Roselli, L. R. P., Almeida, J. A., & Almeida, A. T. (2017). A multicriteria decision model for supplier selection in a food industry based on FITradeoff method. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2017, 1-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/4541914.

Giannakis, M., & Louis, M. (2011). A multi-agent based framework for supply chain risk management. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 17(1), 23-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2010.05.001.

Guarnieri, P., & Almeida, A. T. (2015). Framework to manage suppliers for strategic alliances with a multicriteria method. Production, 25(3), 713-724. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0103-6513.132213.

Haleema, P. K., & Iyengar, N. C. S. N. (2018). A mathematical model with flexible negotiation strategies for agent based negotiations in dynamic e-commerce environments. Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences, 30(4), 547-560. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2016.11.004.

Hoseini, S. A., Fallahpour, A., Wong, K. Y., Mahdiyar, A., Saberi, M., & Durdyev, S. (2021). Sustainable supplier selection in construction industry through hybrid fuzzy-based approaches. Sustainability, 13(3), 1413. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su13031413.

Kan, M., & Miller, S. A. (2022). Environmental impacts of plastic packaging of food products. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 180, 106156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106156.

Kang, T. H. A., Frej, E. A., & Almeida, A. T. (2020). Flexible and interactive tradeoff elicitation for multicriteria sorting problems. Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research, 37(5), 2050020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0217595920500207.

Keeney, R. (1992). Value-focused thinking: a path to creative decision-making: Ralph L. Keeney, Harvard University Press (1996), 416 pp., £11.95. Long Range Planning, 30(2), 314. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0024-6301(97)80025-8.

Kersten, G. E. (2001). Modeling distributive and integrative negotiations. Review and revised characterization. Group Decision and Negotiation, 10(6), 493-514. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1012256222803.

Lee, A. H. I., Kang, H. Y., Hsu, C. F., & Hung, H. C. (2009). A green supplier selection model for high-tech industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(4), 7917-7927. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.11.052.

Macharis, C., & Brans, J.-P. (1998). The GDSS PROMETHEE procedure. Journal of Decision Systems, 7, 283-307.

Nielsen, I. E., Banaeian, N., Golińska, P., Mobli, H., & Omid, M. (2014). Green supplier selection criteria: from a literature review to a flexible framework for determination of suitable criteria. In P. Golińska (Ed.), Logistics Operations, supply chain management and sustainability (pp. 79-99). Cham: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07287-6_6.

Oliveira, A. C., Silva, W. D. O., & Morais, D. C. (2022). Developing and prioritizing lean key performance indicators for plastering supply chains. Production, 32, e20220054. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0103-6513.20220054.

Qin, Y., & Horvath, A. (2022). What contributes more to life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions of farm produce: production, transportation, packaging, or food loss? Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 176, 105945. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105945.

Raiffa, H. (1982). The art and science of negotiation. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Ramos, M. O., Silva, E. M., & Lima-Júnior, F. R. (2020). A fuzzy AHP approach to select suppliers in the Brazilian food supply chain. Production, 30, e20200013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0103-6513.20200013.

Rodrigues, L. V. S., Casado, R. S. G. R., Carvalho, E. N., Silva, M. M., & Silva, L. C. (2020). Using FITradeoff in a ranking problem for supplier selection under TBL performance evaluation: an application in the textile sector. Production, 30, e20190032. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0103-6513.20190032.

Salah, S. B., Yahia, W. B., Ayadi, O., & Masmoudi, F. (2020). A bilateral multi - attribute negotiation - based approach for a VE configuration. Group Decision and Negotiation, 29(5), 923-947. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10726-020-09686-y.

Silva, V. B. S., Morais, D. C., & Almeida, A. T. (2010). A multicriteria group decision model to support watershed committees in Brazil. Water Resources Management, 24(14), 4075-4091. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11269-010-9648-2.

Silva, W. D. O., & Fontana, M. E. (2021). Integrative multi-attribute negotiation model to de fi ne stakeholders ’ responsibilities in the reverse fl ow channel. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279, 123752. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123752.

Sim, K. M., & Wang, S. Y. (2004). Flexible negotiation agent with relaxed decision rules. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. Part B, Cybernetics, 34(3), 1602-1608. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TSMCB.2004.825935. PMid:15484930.

Singh, R. K., & Singh, N. (2005). Quality of packaged foods. In J. H. Han (Ed.), Innovations in food packaging (pp. 24-44, Food Science and Technology). London: Academic Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-012311632-1/50035-8.

Smith, S. B., Gotoh, T., & Greenwood, P. L. (2018). Current situation and future prospects for global beef production: overview of special issue. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 31(7), 927-932. http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.18.0405. PMid:29879806.

Stoshikj, M. (2014). Integrative and distributive negotiations and negotiation behavior. Journal of Service Science Research, 6(1), 29-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12927-014-0002-8.

Testa, F., Di Iorio, V., Cerri, J., & Pretner, G. (2021). Five shades of plastic in food: which potentially circular packaging solutions are Italian consumers more sensitive to. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 173, 105726. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105726.

Thompson, L. L., Wang, J., & Gunia, B. C. (2010). Negotiation. Annual Review of Psychology, 61(1), 491-515. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100458. PMid:19575611.

Tsai, F. M., Bui, T. D., Tseng, M. L., Ali, M. H., Lim, M. K., & Chiu, A. S. (2021). Sustainable supply chain management trends in world regions: a data-driven analysis. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 167, 105421. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105421.

Viana, J. C., & Alencar, L. H. (2012). Metodologias para seleção de fornecedores: uma revisão da literatura. Production, 22(4), 625-636. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-65132012005000067.

Wang, G., Wong, T. N., & Wang, X. (2013). An ontology based approach to organize multi-agent assisted supply chain negotiations. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 65(1), 2-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2012.06.018.

Weiss, A.-P. C. (2017). Negotiation: how to be effective. The Journal of Hand Surgery, 42(1), 53-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.10.009. PMid:27881244.

Yu, C., & Wong, T. N. (2015a). A product bundle determination model for multi-product supplier selection. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 26(2), 369-385. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10845-013-0790-6.

Yu, C., & Wong, T. N. (2015b). An agent-based negotiation model for supplier selection of multiple products with synergy effect. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(1), 223-237. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2014.07.057.
 


Submitted date:
08/04/2022

Accepted date:
05/05/2023

64760d2fa9539567d45a87b4 production Articles
Links & Downloads

Production

Share this page
Page Sections