Production
https://prod.org.br/doi/10.1590/0103-6513.20190022
Production
Thematic Section - Operations Management & Social Good

Assessing the current state of supply chain volatility: development of a benchmarking instrument

Benjamin Nitsche; Frank Straube; Peter Verhoeven

Downloads: 0
Views: 117

Abstract

Abstract: Paper aims: The study proposes a benchmarking instrument that enables managers to critically assess the volatility management performance of a product’s supply chain to identify areas on which to focus when managing supply chain volatility (SCV).

Originality: To the best of the authors’ knowledge, the paper is the first to develop an instrument to assess the current state of SCV management of a product’s supply chain.

Research method: The benchmarking instrument is based on volatility performance data from 87 manufacturing firms. Additionally, a confirmatory case study in the automotive industry is performed to demonstrate the applicability of the instrument.

Main findings: An industry benchmark is conducted that provides valuable information for practitioners about the current state of volatility management performance in the manufacturing sector. This is of high importance since performance data generated by the focal firm itself are more valuable if they can be put into context with the performance data of competitors.

Implications for theory and practice: Since SCV can originate from multiple sources, a case-based evaluation of of SCV of a product’s supply chain is necessary. By applying the instrument, managers will be enables to initiate purposeful strategies that focus on the most pressing sources of SCV.

Keywords

Supply chain volatility, Benchmarking, Performance assessment, Automotive industry

References

Acquaye, A., Genovese, A., Barrett, J., & Lenny Koh, S. C. (2014). Benchmarking carbon emissions performance in supply chains. Supply Chain Management, 19(3), 306-321. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/SCM-11-2013-0419.

Aven, T. (2016). Risk assessment and risk management: review of recent advances on their foundation. European Journal of Operational Research, 253(1), 1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.12.023.

Beamon, B. M. (1999). Measuring supply chain performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 19(3), 275-292. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01443579910249714.

Bowerman, B. L., O’Connell, R. T., Koehler, A. B., & Bowerman, B. L. (2005). Forecasting, time series, and regression: an applied approach (4th ed.). Belmont: Thomson Brooks/Cole.

Camp, R. C. (1989). Benchmarking: the search for industry best practices that lead to superior performance. Milwaukee: Quality Press.

Caridi, M., Crippa, L., Perego, A., Sianesi, A., & Tumino, A. (2010). Measuring visibility to improve supply chain performance: a quantitative approach. Benchmarking, 17(4), 593-615. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14635771011060602.

Chan, F. T. S. (2003). Performance measurement in a supply chain. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 21(7), 534-548. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s001700300063.

Childerhouse, P., Disney, S. M., & Towill, D. R. (2008). On the impact of order volatility in the European automotive sector. International Journal of Production Economics, 114(1), 2-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2007.09.008.

Christopher, M., & Holweg, M. (2011). “Supply chain 2.0”: managing supply chains in the era of turbulence. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 41(1), 63-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09600031111101439.

Christopher, M., & Holweg, M. (2017). Supply chain 2.0 revisited: a framework for managing volatility-induced risk in the supply chain. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 47(1), 2-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-09-2016-0245.

Dattakumar, R., & Jagadeesh, R. (2003). A review of literature on benchmarking. Benchmarking, 10(3), 176-209. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14635770310477744.

Estampe, D., Lamouri, S., Paris, J.-L., & Brahim-Djelloul, S. (2013). A framework for analysing supply chain performance evaluation models. International Journal of Production Economics, 142(2), 247-258. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.11.024.

Forrester, J. W. (1958). Industrial dynamics: a major breakthrough for decision makers. Harvard Business Review, 36(4), 37-66.

Germain, R., Claycomb, C., & Dröge, C. (2008). Supply chain variability, organizational structure, and performance: the moderating effect of demand unpredictability. Journal of Operations Management, 26(5), 557-570. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2007.10.002.

Gunasekaran, A., Patel, C., & Tirtiroglu, E. (2001). Performance measures and metrics in a supply chain environment. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21(1/2), 71-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01443570110358468.

Handfield, R. B., Straube, F., Pfohl, H.-C., & Wieland, A. (2013). Trends and strategies in logistics and supply chain management: embracing global logistics complexity to drive market advantage. Hamburg: DVV Media Group.

Hyndman, R. J., & Koehler, A. B. (2006). Another look at measures of forecast accuracy. International Journal of Forecasting, 22(4), 679-688. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2006.03.001.

Johnson, M. E. (2001). Learning from toys: lessons in managing supply chain risk from the toy industry. California Management Review, 43(3), 106-124. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/41166091.

Kerkkänen, A., Korpela, J., & Huiskonen, J. (2009). Demand forecasting errors in industrial context: measurement and impacts. International Journal of Production Economics, 118(1), 43-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.08.008.

Kim, I., & Springer, M. (2008). Measuring endogenous supply chain volatility: beyond the bullwhip effect. European Journal of Operational Research, 189(1), 172-193. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2007.05.012.

Lee, H. L. (2002). Aligning supply chain strategies with product uncertainties. California Management Review, 44(3), 105-119. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/41166135.

Lee, H. L., Padmanabhan, V., & Whang, S. J. (1997). Information distortion in a supply chain: the bullwhip effect. Management Science, 43(4), 546-558. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.43.4.546.

Leiras, A., González-Calderón, C. A., Brito Junior, I., Villa, S., & Yoshizaki, H. T. (Eds.). (2019). Operations management for social good: 2018 poms international conference in Rio. Switzerland: Springer Nature.

Mentzer, J. T., & Moon, M. A. (2005). Sales forecasting management: a demand management approach (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Nienhaus, J., Ziegenbein, A., & Schoensleben, P. (2006). How human behaviour amplifies the bullwhip effect: a study based on the beer distribution game online. Production Planning and Control, 17(6), 547-557. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09537280600866587.

Nitsche, B. (2018). Unravelling the complexity of supply chain volatility management. Logistics, 2(3), 14. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/logistics2030014.

Nitsche, B. (2019). Development of an assessment tool to control supply chain volatility. Berlin: Universitätsverlag der TU Berlin.

Nitsche, B., & Durach, C. F. (2018). Much discussed, little conceptualized: supply chain volatility. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 48(8), 866-886. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-02-2017-0078.

Nyoman Pujawan, I. (2004). The effect of lot sizing rules on order variability. European Journal of Operational Research, 159(3), 617-635. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00419-3.

Peng Wong, W., & Yew Wong, K. (2008). A review on benchmarking of supply chain performance measures. Benchmarking, 15(1), 25-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14635770810854335.

Randall, T., & Ulrich, K. (2001). Product variety, supply chain structure, and firm performance: analysis of the U.S. bicycle industry. Management Science, 47(12), 1588-1604. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.47.12.1588.10237.

Sangwan, K. S., & Choudhary, K. (2018). Benchmarking manufacturing industries based on green practices. Benchmarking, 25(6), 1746-1761. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-12-2016-0192.

Shafiee, M., Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, F., & Saleh, H. (2014). Supply chain performance evaluation with data envelopment analysis and balanced scorecard approach. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 38(21-22), 5092-5112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2014.03.023.

Simatupang, T. M., & Sridharan, R. (2004). Benchmarking supply chain collaboration: an empirical study. Benchmarking, 11(5), 484-503. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14635770410557717.

So, K. C., & Zheng, X. (2003). Impact of supplier’s lead time and forecast demand updating on retailer’s order quantity variability in a two-level supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 86(2), 169-179. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(03)00050-1.

Stewart, G. (1995). Supply chain performance benchmarking study reveals keys to supply chain excellence. Logistics Information Management, 8(2), 38-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09576059510085000.

Supply Chain Council. (2008). SCOR® supply chain operations reference model. The Supply Chain Council.

Taylor, D. H., & Fearne, A. (2009). Demand management in fresh food value chains: a framework for analysis and improvement. Supply Chain Management, 14(5), 379-392. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13598540910980297.

Van der Vorst, J. G. A. J., Beulens, A. J. M., Wit, W., & Beek, P. (1998). Supply chain management in food chains: Improving performance by reducing uncertainty. International Transactions in Operational Research, 5(6), 487-499. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0969-6016(98)00049-5.

Wagner, S. M., Ullrich, K. K. R., & Transchel, S. (2014). The game plan for aligning the organization. Business Horizons, 57(2), 189-201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2013.11.002.

Weller, M., & Crone, S. F. (2012). Supply chain forecasting: best practices & benchmarking study (Technical Report, No. 2012-11-01). Lancaster Centre For Forecasting. Retrieved in 2019, May 15, from https://www.lancaster.ac.uk/media/lancaster-university/content-assets/documents/lums/forecasting/practitionerpapers/Weller_Crone_Techical_Report_Supply_Chain_Forecasting_Best_Practices_and_Benchmarking_Study.pdf

Wieland, A., Handfield, R. B., & Durach, C. F. (2016). Mapping the landscape of future research themes in supply chain management. Journal of Business Logistics, 37(3), 205-212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jbl.12131.

Wong, C. Y., & Hvolby, H.-H. (2007). Coordinated responsiveness for volatile toy supply chains. Production Planning and Control, 18(5), 407-419. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09537280701425564.

Zsidisin, G. A., Melnyk, S. A., & Ragatz, G. L. (2005). An institutional theory perspective of business continuity planning for purchasing and supply management. International Journal of Production Research, 43(16), 3401-3420. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207540500095613.
 

5d94f99c0e8825914023f1dd production Articles
Links & Downloads

Production

Share this page
Page Sections