Production
https://prod.org.br/doi/10.1590/0103-6513.20180106
Production
Research Article

Collaboration, competition and innovation: a consortium of tribology in the automotive sector

Ana Paula Lopes; André Ferrarese; Marly Monteiro de Carvalho

Downloads: 0
Views: 168

Abstract

Abstract: Paper aims: The collaboration among competitors represents a substantial challenge for most innovation processes of companies. This research aims to explore the factors influencing collaboration for innovation that involves competitors in the Fuzzy Front End phase.

Originality: This study provides an important advance in three aspects. First, it brings outstanding contributions to the process of generation of ideas and knowledge in a context that involves collaboration and competition simultaneously. In addition, the research examines how this has evolved over time, which were the main difficulties, which were the most significant barriers and necessary efforts to mitigate them. Another important contribution was learning generated on how to work ideas and opportunities in the Fuzzy Front End phase of innovation. Finally, it contributes to the identification of the main roles of Universities in this context.

Research method: The findings from a detailed case study on a Brazilian University-industry consortium in the automotive sector are presented.

Main findings: The results indicate a concentration of companies in three main groups with very different operations: the group related to the ring and cylinder lubrificantion system, the automakers and Universities.

Implications for theory and practice: The main practical and theoretical contributions of this research is exactly the pioneering nature with regard to automakers working collaboratively.

Keywords

Innovation management, Competition, Collaborative work

References

Abernathy, W. J., & Clark, K. B. (1985). Innovation: mapping the winds of creative destruction. Research Policy, 14(1), 3-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(85)90021-6.

Amara, N., & Landry, R. (2005). Sources of information as determinants of novelty of innovation in manufacturing firms: evidence from the 1999 Statistics Canada Innovation Survey. Technovation, 25(3), 245-259. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(03)00113-5.

Ariño, A. (2003). Measures of strategic alliance performance: an analysis of construct validity. Journal of International Business Studies, 34(1), 66-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400005.

Armellini, F., Kaminski, O. C., & Beaudry, C. (2011). Consortium for research and innovation in aerospace in Quebec, Canada: a reference model for the Brazilian aerospace industry. Research Policy, 26, 191-207.

Bidault, F., & Castello, A. (2009). Trust and creativity: understanding the role of trust in creativity oriented joint developments. R&D Management, 39(3), 259-270. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2009.00557.x.

Blomqvist, K., Hurmelinna, P., & Seppänen, R. (2005). Playing the collaboration game right: balancing trust and contracting. Technovation, 25(5), 497-504. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2004.09.001.

Bogers, M. (2011). The open innovation paradox: knowledge sharing and protection in R&D collaborations. European Journal of Innovation Management, 14(1), 93-117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14601061111104715.

Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. (1995). The right game: use game theory to shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 73, 57-71.

Branstetter, L. G., & Sakakibara, M. (2002). When do research consortia work well and why? Evidence from Japanese panel data. The American Economic Review , 92(1), 143-159. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/000282802760015649.

Bruneel, J., D’Este, P., & Salter, A. (2010). Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university-industry collaboration. Research Policy , 39(7), 858-868. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.03.006.

Bstieler, L., Hemmert, M., & Barczak, G. (2015). Trust formation in university-industry collaborations in the U.S. Biotechnology Industry: IP policies, shared governance, and champions. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(1), 111-121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12242.

Buganza, T., & Verganti, R. (2009). Benefícios da cooperação entre compradores e fornecedores: um estudo no setor de tecnologia de informação e comunicação. European Journal of Innovation Management , 12(3), 306-325. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14601060910974200.

Caloghirou, Y., Kastelli, I., & Tsakanikas, A. (2004). Internal capabilities and external knowledge sources: complements or substitutes for innovative performance? Technovation , 24(1), 29-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(02)00051-2.

Cammarano, A., Caputo, M., Lamberti, E., & Michelino, F. (2017). Open innovation and intellectual property: a knowledge-based approach. Management Decision , 55(6), 1182-1208. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/MD-03-2016-0203.

Carvalho, M. M. (2009). Inovação: estratégias e comunidades de conhecimento. São Paulo: Atlas.

Chang, Y.-C. (2003). Benefits of co-operation on innovative performance: evidence from integrated circuits and biotechnology firms in the UK and Taiwan. R & D Management , 33(4), 425-437. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9310.00308.

Cheng, C. C. J., & Huizingh, E. K. R. E. (2014). When is open innovation beneficial? The role of Strategic orientation. Journal of Product Innovation Management , 31(6), 1235-1253. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12148.

Cheng, C. C. J., & Shiu, E. C. (2015). The inconvenient truth of the relationship between open innovation activities and innovation performance. Management Decision , 53(3), 625-647. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/MD-03-2014-0163.

Christensen, C. M. (1997). Making strategy: learning by doing. Harvard Business Review, 75(6), 141-146. PMid:10174795.

Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive-capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2393553.

Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00988593.

Edwards, T. (2000). Innovation and organizational change: developments towards an interactive process perspective. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management , 12(4), 445-464. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/713698496.

Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24160888.

Erez, M., Lee, C., & Zhong, W. (2016). Can cooperating with competitors benefit innovation? A cross-cultural study. International Journal of Psychology, 51, 750-751.

Faems, D., Van Looy, B., & Debackere, K. (2005). Interorganizational collaboration and innovation: toward a portfolio approach. Journal of Product Innovation Management , 22(3), 238-250. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0737-6782.2005.00120.x.

Frishammar, J., Ericsson, K., & Patel, P. C. (2015). The dark side of knowledge transfer: exploring knowledge leakage in joint R&D projects. Technovation , 41-42, 75-88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2015.01.001.

Garcia, R., & Calantone, R. (2002). A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: a literature review. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19(2), 110-132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0737-6782(01)00132-1.

Gesing, J., Antons, D., Piening, E. P., Rese, M., & Salge, T. D. (2015). Joining forces or going it alone? On the interplay among external collaboration partner types, interfirm governance modes, and internal R&D. Journal of Product Innovation Management , 32(3), 424-440. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12227.

Ghisetti, C., Marzucchi, A., & Montresor, S. (2015). The open eco-innovation mode: an empirical investigation of eleven European country. Research Policy , 44(5), 1080-1093. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.12.001.

Gnyawali, D. R., & Park, B.-J. R. (2009). Co-opetition and technological innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises: a multilevel conceptual model. Journal of Small Business Management, 47(3), 308-330. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2009.00273.x.

Gnyawali, D. R., & Park, B.-J. R. (2011). Co-opetition between giants: collaboration with competitors for technological innovation. Research Policy, 40(5), 650-663. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.01.009.

Gnyawali, D. R., He, J., & Madhavan, R. (2006). Impact of co-opetition on firm competitive behavior: an empirical examination. Journal of Management, 43(4), 507-530. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0149206305284550.

Greco, M., Grimaldi, M., & Cricelli, L. (2017). Hitting the nail on the head: exploring the relationship between public subsidies and open innovation efficiency. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 118, 213-215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.02.022.

Gulati, R., & Singh, H. (1998). The architecture of cooperation: managing coordination costs and appropriation concerns in strategic alliances. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(4), 781-814. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2393616.

Gulati, R., Nohria, N., & Zaheer, A. (2000). Strategic network. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 203-215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<203::AID-SMJ102>3.0.CO;2-K.

Harrigan, K. R., & Newman, W. H. (1990). Bases of interorganization co-operation: propensity, power, persistence. Journal of Management Studies, 27(4), 417-434. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1990.tb00255.x.

Huang, M.-H., & Chen, D.-Z. (2017). How can academic innovation performance in university-industry collaboration be improved? Technological Performance and Social Change , 123, 210-215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.03.024.

Huston, L., & Sakkab, N. (2007). Connect and develop: inside Procter & Gamble’s new model for innovation. Harvard Business Review, 84(3), 58-66. PMid:17348170.

Ingham, M., & Mothe, C. (1998). How to learn in R&D partnerships? R&D Management, 28(4), 249-261. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9310.00102.

Jameson, J., Ferrell, G., Kelly, J., Walker, S., & Ryan, M. (2006). Building trust and shared knowledge in communities of E-learning practice: collaborative leadership in the JISC eLISA and CAMEL lifelong learning projects. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(6), 949-967. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00669.x.

Jorde, T. M., & Teece, D. J. (1989). Competition and cooperation: striking the right balance. California Management Review, 31(3), 25-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/41166568.

Kafouros, M., Wang, C., Piperopoulos, P., & Zhang, M. (2015). Academic collaborations and firm innovation performance in China: the role of region-specific institutions. Research Policy, 44(3), 803-817. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.11.002.

Kessler, E. H., Bierly, P. E., & Gopalakrishnan, S. (2000). Internal vs external learning in new product development: effects on speed, costs and competitive advantage. R&D Management, 30(3), 213-223. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9310.00172.

Kim, J., & Wilemon, D. (2002). Focusing the fuzzy front-end in new product development. R&D Management, 32(4), 269-279. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9310.00259.

Kim, S., Kim, H., & Kim, E. (2016). Knowledge flow affects Korean ICT manufacturing performance: a focus on open innovation strategy. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management , 28(10), 1167-1181. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2016.1182150.

Koen, P., Ajamian, G., Burkart, R., Clamen, A., Davidson, J., D’Amore, R., Elkins, C., Herald, K., Incorvia, M., Johnson, A., Karol, R., Seibert, R., Slavejkov, A., & Wagner, K. (2001). Providing clarity and a common language to the “Fuzzy Front End”. Research Technology Management, 44(2), 46-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2001.11671418.

Kogut, B. (1988). Joint ventures: theoretical and empirical perspectives. Strategic Management Journal, 9(4), 319-332. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250090403.

Lau, A. K., & Lo, W. (2015). Regional innovation system, absorptive capacity and innovation performance: an empirical study. Technological Forecasting and Social Change , 92, 99-114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.11.005.

Lin, C., Tsai, H.-L., & Wu, J.-C. (2014). Collaboration strategy decision-making using the Miles and Snow typology. Journal of Business Research, 67(9), 1979-1990. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.10.013.

Lin, J.-Y. (2017). Balancing industry collaboration and academic innovation: the contingent role of collaboration-specific attributes. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 123, 216-228. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.03.016.

Locke, K. D. (2003). Grounded theory in management research. London: Sage Publications. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9780857024428.

Mangematin, V., & Nesta, L. (1999). What kind of knowledge can a firm absorb? International Journal of Technology Management, 37(3-4), 149-172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.1999.002771.

Morrison, P. D., Roberts, J. H., & Von Hippel, E. (2000). Determinants of user innovation and innovation sharing in a local market. Management Science, 46(12), 1513-1527. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.12.1513.12076.

Murphy, S. A., & Kumar, V. (1997). The front end of new product development: a Canadian survey. R & D Management, 27(1), 5-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9310.00038.

Naqshbandi, M. M. (2016). Managerial ties and open innovation: examining the role of absorptive capacity. Management Decision, 54(9), 1-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/MD-03-2016-0161.

Nieto, M. J., & Santamaría, L. (2007). The importance of diverse collaborative networks for the novelty of product innovation. Technovation, 27(6-7), 367-377. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2006.10.001.

Nooteboom, B. (1994). Innovation and diffusion in small firms: theory and evidence. Small Business Economics, 6(5), 327-347. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01065137.

Odagiri, H., Nakamura, Y., & Shibuya, M. (1997). Research consortia as a vehicle for basic research: the case of a fifth generation computer project in Japan. Research Policy , 26(2), 191-207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00008-5.

Pavitt, K. (1984). Sectoral patterns of technical change: towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy, 13(6), 343-373. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(84)90018-0.

Perkmann, M., & Schildt, H. (2015). Open data partnership between firms and universities: the role of boundary organizations. Research Policy, 44(5), 1133-1143. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.12.006.

Perkmann, M., & Walsh, K. (2007). University-industry relationships and open innovation: towards a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews , 9(4), 259-280. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00225.x.

Popa, S., Soto-Acosta, P., & Martinez-Conesa, I. (2017). Antecedents, moderators, and outcomes of innovation climate and open innovation: an empirical study in SMEs. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 118, 134-142. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.02.014.

Quintana-García, C., & Benavides-Velasco, C. A. (2004). Cooperation, competition, and innovative capability: a panel data of European dedicated biotechnology firms. Technovation, 24(12), 927-938. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(03)00060-9.

Ritala, P., Olander, H., Michailova, S., & Husted, K. (2015). Knowledge sharing, knowledge leaking and relative innovation performance: an empirical study. Technovation , 35, 22-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2014.07.011.

Santoro, M. D., & Saparito, P. A. (2003). The firm’s trust in its University partner as a key mediator in advancing knowledge and new technologies. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 50(3), 362-373. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2003.817287.

Schilling, M. A., & Phelps, C. C. (2007). Inter firm collaboration networks: the impact of large-scale network structure innovation. Management Science, 53(7), 1113-1126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0624.

Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. New Jersey: Transactions Publishers.

Sherwood, A. L., & Covin, J. G. (2008). Knowledge acquisition in university-industry alliances: an empirical investigation from a learning theory perspective. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25(2), 162-179. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2008.00292.x.

Shvindina, H. O. (2017). Innovation of strategic management development from competition to competition. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 1(1), 180-192. http://dx.doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2017.1-16.

Smith, P. G., & Reinertsen, D. G. (1998). Developing products in half the time . New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. California: Sage Publications.

Takey, S. M., & Carvalho, M. M. (2016). Fuzzy front end of systemic innovations: a conceptual framework based on a systematic literature review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 111, 97-109. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.06.011.

Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15(6), 285-305. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2.

Teece, D. J., Pisano, G. P., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z.

Tether, B. S., & Tajar, A. (2008). Beyond industry-university links: sourcing knowledge for innovation from consultants, private research organizations and the public science-base. Research Policy, 37(6-7), 1079-1095. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.04.003.

Un, C. A., & Asakawa, K. (2015). Types of R&D collaborations and process innovation: the benefit of collaborating upstream in the knowledge chain. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(1), 138-153. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12229.

West, J., & Bogers, M. (2014). Leveraging external sources of innovation: a review of research on open innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management , 31(4), 814-831. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12125.

Zhao, L., Xiang, Y., & Yi, Q. (2017). Fuzzy front end patent management and innovation performance mediating role of patent commercialization and moderating effect of technological lock-in. Management Decision, 55(6), 1143-1162. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/MD-03-2016-0127.
 

5cb4d96e0e88258127ce6ba5 production Articles
Links & Downloads

Production

Share this page
Page Sections