Production
https://prod.org.br/article/doi/10.1590/S0103-65132014005000019
Production
Article

Critérios de sucesso em projetos: um estudo exploratório considerando a interferência das variáveis tipologia de projetos e stakeholders

Project success criteria: an exploratory study on the influence of the variables project typology and type of stakeholder

Borges, Julia Garaldi; Carvalho, Marly Monteiro de

Downloads: 0
Views: 1045

Resumo

O objetivo deste trabalho é compreender a influência das variáveis tipologia de projeto e tipo de stakeholder nos critérios de sucesso em projetos. A abordagem metodológica envolveu em uma primeira fase uma revisão da literatura, seguida de uma pesquisa de campo com estratégia híbrida, qualitativa e quantitativa. A pesquisa foi desenvolvida em uma empresa de engenharia e soluções integradas de infraestrutura com atuação em diversos setores. O trabalho de campo envolveu coleta e análise de dados de 54 projetos e um levantamento com 59 gerentes e outros envolvidos na atividade de projeto para identificar a importância dos critérios de sucesso. Os resultados apontam para uma influência significativa do tipo de projeto na importância dos critérios de sucesso, no entanto o mesmo não ocorreu para o tipo de stakeholder.

Palavras-chave

Gestão de projetos. Avaliação de desempenho em projetos. Tipologia. Stakeholder. Teoria contingencial

Abstract

In this study, we aim to understand the influence of the variables project typology and type of stakeholder on project success criteria. We used a quantitative and qualitative methodological approach which encompasses a review of the literature followed by a field research analysis using hybrid research strategy. The research occurred in a company whose business includes integrated solutions in engineering and infrastructure in various industrial sectors. Data were collected from projects at 54 organizations and from a survey with 59 project managers and other professionals involved in project management activities. The results showed a significant influence of the type of project in the success criteria level of importance, but the same did not occur regarding the type of stakeholder.

Keywords

Project management. Success criteria. Typology. Stakeholder. Contingent theory

References



Atkinson, R. (1999). Project management: cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, its time to accept other success criteria. International Journal of Project Management, 17(6), 337-342. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00069-6

Balachandra, R., & Friar, J. H. (1997). Factors for success in R&D projects and new product innovation: a contextual framework. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 44(3), 276-287. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/17.618169

Barclay, C. (2008). Towards an intergrated measurement of is project performance: the project performance scorecard. Information Systems Fronties, 10(3), 331-345. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10796-008-9083-6

Belassi, W., & Tukel, O. (1996). A new framework for determining critical success/failure factors in projects. International Journal of Project Management, 14(3), 141-151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0263-7863(95)00064-X

Carvalho, M. M., & Rabechini Junior, R. (2011). Fundamentos em Gestão de Projetos: Construindo competências para gerenciar projetos: teoria e casos (3. ed.). São Paulo: Atlas.

Chan, A., & Chan, A. (2004). Key performance indicators for measuring construction success. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 11(2), 203-221. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14635770410532624

Clark, K., & Fujimoto, T. (1991). Product development performance. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Cleland, D., & King, W. (1967). Systems analysis and project management. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Constructon Industry Institute - CII. (2006). Leading indicators during project execution (Resarch Summary 220-1). University of Texas in Austin.

Cooke-Davies, T. (2002). The" real" success factors on projects. International Journal of Project Management, 20(3), 185-190. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(01)00067-9

Cummings, J., & Doh, J. (2000). Identifying who matters: mapping key players in multiple environments. California Management Review, 42(2), 83-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/41166034

De Wit, A. (1988). Measurement of project success. International Journal of Project Management, 6(3), 164-170. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0263-7863(88)90043-9

Elattar, S. (2009). Towards developing an improved methodology for evaluating performance and achieving success in construction projects. Scientific Research and Essays, 4(6), 549-554.

Evaristo, R., & Van Fenema, P. C. (1999). A typology of project management: Emergence and evolution of new forms. International Journal of Project Management, 17(5), 275-281. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00041-6

Fortune, J., & White, D. (2006). Framing of project critical success factors by a systems model. International Journal of Project Management, 24(1), 53-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.07.004

Freeman, R. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.

Hair, J., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Hatush, Z., & Skitmore, M. (1997). Evaluating contractor prequalification data: selection criteria and project success factors. Construction Management and Economics, 15(2), 129-147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01446199700000002

Kerzner, H. (2010). The future of project management. In: The future of project management. São Paulo: International Institute for Learning.

Kometa, S., Olomolaiye, P., & Harris, F. (1995). An evaluation of clients' needs and responsibilities in the construction process. Engineering, construction and Architectural management, 2(1), 57-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/eb021003

Kumaraswamy, M., & Thorpe, A. (1996). Systematizing construction project evaluations. Journal of Management in Engineering, 12(1), 34-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(1996)12:1(34)

Lim, C., & Mohamed, M. (1999). Criteria of project success: an exploratory re-examination. International Journal of Project Management, 17(4), 243-248. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00040-4

Maximiano, A. (1997). Administração de projetos: como transformar idéias em resultados. São Paulo: Atlas.

Mitchell, R., Agle, B., & Wood, D. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853-886.

Navarre, C., & Schaan, J. (1990). Design of project management systems from top management´s perspective. Project Management Journal, 21(2), 19-27.

Office of Government Commerce - OGC. (2002). Managing successful programmes. Norwich: The Stationery Office.

Office of Government Commerce - OGC. (2005). Managing successful project with PRINCE2. Norwich: The Stationery Office.

Pinto, J., & Slevin, D. (1988). Project success: definitions and measurement techniques. Project Management Journal, 19(1), 67-72.

Pocock, J. B., Hyun, C. T., Liu, L. Y., & Kim, M. K. (1996). Relationship between project interaction and performance indicators. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 122(2), 165-176. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1996)122:2(165)

Project Management Institute - PMI. (2008). Um guia do conhecimento em gerenciamento de projetos (guia PMBOK). Newton Square: Project Management Institute.

Rabechini Junior, R, & Carvalho, M. M. (2009). Gestão projetos inovadores em uma perspectiva contingencial: análise teórico-conceitual e proposição de um modelo. Revista de Administração e Inovação, 6(3), 63.

Sanvido, V., Grobler, F., Parfitt, K., Guvenis, M., & Coyle, M. (1992). Critical success factors for construction projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 118(1), 94-111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1992)118:1(94)

Shenhar, A. J. (2001). One size does not fit all projects: Exploring classical contingency domains. Management Science, 47(3), 394-414. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.47.3.394.9772

Shenhar, A. J., Tishler, A., Dvir, D., Lipovetsky, S., & Lechler, T. (2002). Refining the search for project success factors: A multivariate, typological approach. R and D Management, 32(2), 111-126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9310.00244

Shenhar, A. J., Dvir, D., Milosevic, D., Mulenburg, J., Patanakul, P., Reilly, R., Ryan, M., Sage, A., Sauser, B., Srivannaboon, S., Stefanovic, J., & Thamhain, H. T (2005). Toward a NASA-specific project management framework. Engineering Management Journal, 17(4), 8-16.

Shenhar, A., & Dvir, D. (2007). Reinventing project management: The diamond approach to successful growth and innovation. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Siegelaub, J. M. (2010). Da tripla à sêxtupla restrição: um modelo de destaque para controle de projetos no PRINCE2. Mundo Project Management, 6(33).

Toor, S., & Ogunlana, S. (2009). Beyond the the 'iron triangle': Stakeholder perception of key performance indicators (KPIs) for large-scale public sector development projects. International Journal of Project Management, 28(3), 228-236. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.05.005

Velicer, W., & Jackson, D. (1990). Component analysis versus common factor analysis: Some issues in selecting an appropriate procedure. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25(1), 1-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2501_1

Vidal, L. A., & Marle, F. (2008). Understanding project complexity: Implications on project management. Kybernetes, 37(8), 1094-1110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/03684920810884928

Westerveld, E. (2003). The Project Excellence Model®: linking success criteria and critical success factors. International Journal of Project Management, 21(6), 411-418. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00112-6
5883a4537f8c9da00c8b489d production Articles
Links & Downloads

Production

Share this page
Page Sections