Produtividade sistêmica: conceitos e aplicações
Systemic productivity: concepts and aplications
King, Ney Cesar de O.; Lima, Edson Pinheiro de; Costa, Sergio Eduardo G. da
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-65132013005000006
Production, vol.24, n1, p.160-176, 2014
Resumo
O estudo de temas relacionados à produtividade ocupa um lugar de destaque na agenda estratégica das empresas desde a gênese dos modelos de produção em massa. Vários modelos, processos e técnicas vêm sendo desenvolvidos com o propósito de melhorar os atuais níveis de desempenho das organizações. O conceito de produtividade evoluiu de uma abordagem unidimensional para um enfoque sistêmico, no entanto as diferentes técnicas desenvolvidas para a sua mensuração tratam de dimensões específicas. Há, portanto, a necessidade de se integrar tais técnicas em um modelo de gestão pela produtividade sistêmica, o que constitui o principal objetivo deste artigo. Partindo da construção de um conjunto de determinantes teóricos que representam a produtividade sistêmica, desenvolveu-se um processo para a sua mensuração utilizando-se como metodologia a abordagem por processos de Cambridge. Tal processo foi refinado via entrevistas e é ilustrado por um caso de simulação.
Palavras-chave
Produtividade sistêmica. Desempenho organizacional. Auditoria de negócios
Abstract
The study of themes related to productivity has occupied a special place in the strategic agenda of enterprises since the beginnings of mass production. Several models, processes and techniques have been developed with the purpose of improving the present performance levels of organizations. The concept of productivity has been following an evolution cycle from one-dimension approach to a systemic view; however, the different techniques used for its measurement are designed only for some of its specific dimensions. There is a need for integrating those techniques through a systemic productivity management model, and this is the main objective of this paper. Starting from a set of theoretical guidelines that represents the systemic productivity management model, a process was developed for its measurement using the Cambridge process approach. This process was refined by interviews with experts and illustrated by a case study simulation.
Keywords
Systemic productivity. Organizational performance. Business auditing
References
ARBIX, G.; DE NEGRI, J. A. A nova competitividade da indústria e o novo empresariado: uma hipótese de trabalho. Instituto de Estudos Avançados da Universidade de São Paulo, 2005. Texto para discussão. Disponível em:
BOOTHBY, D.; DUFOUR, A.; TANG, J. Technology adoption, training and productivity performance. Research Policy, v. 39, n. 5, p. 650-661, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.02.011
CHEN, L. H.; LIAW, S. Y. Investigating resource utilization and product competence to improve production management: an empirical study. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, v. 21, n. 9, p. 1180-1194, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005922
CHEN, L. H.; LIAW, S. Y.; CHEN, Y. S. Using financial factors to investigate productivity: an empirical study in Taiwan. Industrial Management & Data Systems, v. 101, n. 7, p. 378-384, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005826
CHENG, L. C.; SILVA, J. M.; LIMA, F. P. A. Desafios da qualidade e produtividade à engenharia de produção do Brasil. Produção, v. 4, n. 2, p. 127-140, 1994.
CHUNG, W. K. Benchmarking Singapore's high-TQM maturity organizations. Benchmarking: An International Journal, v. 8, n. 1, p. 8-34, 2001.
COUGHLAN, P.; COGHLAN, D. Action research for operations management. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, v. 22, n. 2, p. 220-240, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01443570210417515
DEMETER, K.; CHIKÁN, A.; MATYUSZ, Z. Labour productivity change: drivers, business impact and macroeconomic moderators. International Journal of Production Economics, v. 131, n. 1, p. 215-223, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.11.003
DONE, A.; VOSS, C. A.; RYTTER, N. G. Best practice interventions: short-term impact and long-term outcomes. Journal of Operations Management, v. 29, n. 5, p. 500-513, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2010.11.007
GOLDRATT, E. A síndrome do palheiro, garimpando informação num oceano de dados. São Paulo: Educatur, 1992.
GOUVEA DA COSTA, S. E.; PLATTS, K. W.; FLEURY, A. C. C. Strategic selection of advanced manufacturing technologies (AMT), based on the manufacturing vision. International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology, v. 27, n. 1, p. 12-23, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJCAT.2006.010985
GRONROOS, O. C.; OJASAL, K. Service productivity towards a conceptualization of the transformation of inputs into economic results in services. Journal of Business Research, v. 57, n. 4, p. 414-423, 2004.
HAMERI, A.-P.; LEHTONEN, J.-M. Production and supply management strategies in Nordic paper mills. Scandinavian Journal of Management, v. 17, n. 3, p. 379-396, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0956-5221(99)00042-1
HOLWEG, M. The genealogy of lean production. Journal of Operations Management, v. 25, n. 2, p. 420-437, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2006.04.001
HUANG, S. H. et al. Manufacturing productivity improvement using effectiveness metrics and simulation analysis. International Journal of Production Research, v. 41, n. 3, p. 513-527, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0020754021000042391
INSTITUTO BRASILEIRO DA QUALIDADE E PRODUTIVIDADE - IBQP. Diagnóstico da produtividade sistêmica. Curitiba: IBQP, 2004. Programa de capacitação de agentes da produtividade - módulo IV.
JOEL, G.; DANIEL, B. Blurring the boundary: convergence of factory and service processes. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, v. 21, n. 3, p. 341-354, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17410381011024322
KARMAKAR, U. S.; APTE, U. M. Operations management in the information economy: Information products, processes, and chains. Journal of Operations Management, v. 25, n. 2, p. 438-453, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2006.11.001
KUMBHAKAR, S. C. Productivity measurement: a profit function approach. Applied Economics Letters, v. 9, n. 5, p. 331-334, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13504850110067469
LENTZ, R.; MORTENSEN, D. T. Productivity growth and worker reallocation. International Economic Review, v. 43, n. 3, p. 731-749, 2005.
MICHAEL, P.; MATTHEW, T. Performance measurement in facilities management: driving innovation? Property Management, v. 26, n. 4, p. 241-254, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02637470810894885
MORIKAWA, M. Labor unions and productivity: an empirical analysis using Japanese firm-level data. Labour Economics, v. 17, n. 6, p. 1030-1037, 2010.
NANERE, M. et al. Environmentally adjusted productivity measurement: An Australian case study. Journal of Environmental Management, v. 85, n. 2, p. 350-362, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.10.004
NIN, A. et al. Bridging the gap between partial and total factor productivity measures using directional distance functions. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, v. 85, n. 4, p. 928-942, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8276.00498
OLIVEIRA, J. A. et al. Um estudo sobre a utilização de sistemas, programas e ferramentas da qualidade em empresas do interior de São Paulo. Produção, v. 21, n. 4, p. 708-723, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-65132011005000044
OLIVEIRA, J. H. R. Método para avaliação de indicadores de sustentabilidade organizacional. 2002. Tese (Doutorado em Engenharia de Produção)-Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, 2002.
OLIVEIRA, U. R.; MARINS, F. A. S.; ALMEIDA, D. A. Integrando técnicas e procedimentos de gestão de operações: uma aplicação em um banco comercial brasileiro de grande porte. Produção, v. 20, n. 2, p. 237-250, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-65132010005000008
O'MAHONY, M.; TIMMER, M. P. Output, Input and productivity measures at the industry level: the EU KLEMS database. The Economic Journal, v. 119, n. 538, p. 374-403, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2009.02280.x
ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT - OECD. Measuring productivity: measurement of aggregate and industry-level productivity growth - OECD manual. Paris: OECD, 2001. 156 p.
ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT - OECD. Revision of international recommendations for index of industrial production. Viena: OECD, 2005a. 33 p. Background paper.
ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT - OECD. Measuring material flows and resource productivity OECD approach and work plan. Nova Iorque: OECD, 2005b. 7 p. Preliminary meeting of the UN Committee on Environmental-Economic Accounting information note.
PLATTS, K. A process approach to researching manufacturing strategy. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, v. 13, n. 8, p. 4-17, 1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01443579310039533
PLATTS, K. Characteristics of methodologies for manufacturing strategy formulation. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, v. 7, n. 2, p. 93-99, 1994. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0951-5240(94)90003-5
PLATTS, K.; GREGORY, M. Manufacturing audit in the process of strategy formulation. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, v. 10, n. 9, p. 5-26, 1990. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000001264
PLATTS, K. W. et al. Evaluating manufacturing strategy formulation processes. International Journal of Production Economics, v. 46-47, n. 1, p. 233-240, 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0925-5273(95)00029-1
PLATTS, K. W. et al. Testing manufacturing strategy formulation processes. International Journal of Production Economics, v. 56-57, n. 1, p. 517-523, 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(97)00134-5
SADIKOGLU, E. Integration of work measurement and total quality management. Total Quality Management, v. 16, n. 5, p. 597-605, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14783360500077518
SAHAY, B. S. Multi-factor productivity measurement model for service organization. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, v. 54, n. 1, p. 7-22, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17410400510571419
SARKIS, J. Quantitative models for performance measurement systems - alternate considerations. International Journal of Production Economics, v. 86, n. 1, p. 81-90, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(03)00055-0
SENGUPTA, J. K. The measurement of dynamic productivity efficiency. Bulletin of Economic Research, v. 51, n. 2, p. 111-124, 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8586.00074
SHIMIZU, M.; WAINAI K.; AVEDILLO-CRUZ, E. Value added productivity measurement and its practical applications with linkage between productivity and profitability. Tokyo: Japan Productivity Center for Socio-Economic Development, 1997. 223 p.
SINGH, H.; MOTWANI, J.; KUMAR, A. A review and analysis of the state-of-the-art research on productivity measurement. Industrial Management and Data Systems, v. 100, n. 5, p. 234-241, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02635570010335271
SOUSA, R.; VOSS, C. A. Contingency research in operations management practices. Journal of Operations Management, v. 26, n. 6, p. 697-713, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2008.06.001
SPITHOVEN, A. H. G. M. The productivity paradox and the business cycle. International Journal of Social Economics, v. 30, n. 6, p. 679-699, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/03068290310474094
SUITO, K. Total productivity management. Work Studies, v. 47, n. 4, p. 117-127, 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00438029810222469
THIOLLENT, M. Metodologia da pesquisa-ação. 6. ed. São Paulo: Cortez, 1994.
UKKO, J.; TENHUNEN, J.; RANTANEN, H. Performance measurement impacts on management and leadership: Perspectives of management and employees. International Journal of Production Economics, v. 110, n. 1-2, p. 39-51, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2007.02.008