Production
https://prod.org.br/article/doi/10.1590/S0103-65132007000200003
Production
Article

Aplicações do diagrama emergético triangular na tomada de decisão ecoeficiente

Applications of the emergetic ternary diagram for eco-efficient decision making

Giannetti, Biagio F.; Barrella, Flávio A.; Bonilla, Silvia H.; Almeida, Cecilia M. Villas Bôas de

Downloads: 0
Views: 1057

Resumo

Diagramas ternários aliados à análise emergética são utilizados como ferramenta de suporte à tomada de decisão. A representação gráfica dos resultados da análise emergética possibilita comparar sistemas, produtos e serviços considerando os serviços provenientes do meio ambiente e da economia, avaliar melhorias e acompanhar o desempenho de um sistema produtivo. A ferramenta gráfica é versátil e pode ser aplicada para representar o desempenho de produtos, processos ou países, em um determinado período ou ao longo do tempo. Para ilustrar o uso dos diagramas emergéticos triangulares na tomada de decisão foi empregado um exemplo hipotético e quatro retirados da literatura. Mostra-se que as propriedades dos diagramas triangulares auxiliam na avaliação da ficiência dos sistemas e sua dependência dos recursos renováveis e não renováveis. Com o auxílio dos diagramas, as interações entre sistemas produtivos e as interações entre esses sistemas e o meio ambiente podem ser imediatamente verificadas e avaliadas.

Palavras-chave

Emergia, tomada de decisão, ferramenta gráfica, indicadores de sustentabilidade, diagramas ternários

Abstract

Emergetic ternary diagrams and emergy accounting are used as support tools for decision making. The graphical representation of emergy analysis permits to compare systems, products and services taking into account the environmental support, to evaluate improvements and to follow systems performance with time. The graphic tool is versatile and can ce applied to represent the performance of products, processes and even countries, within a given period or along the time. To illustrate the use of emergetic ternary diagrams to support decision making, examples taken from the literature were employed. It is shown that the diagram properties help evaluating systems efficiency, their dependence on renewable and non renewable resouces and on environmental services to absorb pollutants. With the aid of emergetic ternary diagrams, the interactions between systems and between these systems and the environment can be readly verified and evaluated.

Keywords

Emergy, decision making, graphic tool, sustainability indices, ternary diagrams

References



AZZONE, G.; BERTELE, U. Exploiting green strategies for competitive advantages. Long Range Planning, v. 27, n. 6, p. 69-81, 1997.

BARRELLA F. A.; ALMEIDA, C. M. V. B; GIANNETTi B. F. Ferramenta para tomada de decisão considerando a interação dos sistemas de produção e meio ambiente. Revista Produção, v. 15, p. 87-101, 2005.

BASTIANONI S. A definition of pollution based on thermodynamic goal functions. Ecological Modelling, v. 113, p. 163-166, 1998.

BROWN M. T.; ULGIATI, S. Emergybased indices and ratios to evaluate sustainability: monitoring economies and technology toward environmentally sound innovation. Ecological Engineering, v. 9, p. 51-69, 1997.

_____________. Emergy Evaluations and Environmental Loading of Electricity Production Systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 10, p. 21-334, 2002.

BUSICO, A. (Org). Pubblicazione della Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri – Dipartimento per l’Informazione e l’Editoria Direttore: Mauro Mais – Stampa e diffusione Istituto Poligrafico e Zecca dello Stato S.p.A. Relatório. Salário, Roma, 2003.

FALCONI-BENITEZ, F. An integrated assessment of changes in land-use in Equador. In: ULGIATI, S. (Ed.). Advances in Energy Studies, v. 2. Porto Venere, Italy: SGE Editoriali, p. 409-421, 2000.

GERBENS-LEENES P. W; NONHEBEL, S. Resource use efficiencies in primary production systems: comparison between two disciplines. In: ULGIATI, S. (Ed.). Advances in Energy Studies, v. 2. Porto Venere, Italy: SGE Editoriali, p. 235-242, 2000.

GIAMPIETRO, M.; MUNDA, G. Integrated assessment of complex adaptative systems: an overview of epistemological challenges. In: ULGIATI, S. (Ed.). Advances in Energy Studies, v. 2. Porto Venere, Italy: SGE Editoriali, p. 305-318, 2000.

GIANNANTONI, C.; MIRANDOLA, A.; TONON, S.; ULGIATI, S. (2002) Energybased, Four-sector diagram os benefits as a decision making tool. In: ULGIATI, S. (Ed.). Advances in Energy Studies, v. 3. Porto Venere, Italy: SGE Editoriali, p. 575-586, 2002.

GIANNETTI, B. F.; BARRELLA, F. A.; ALMEIDA, C. M. V. B. A combined tool for environmental scientists and decision makers: ternary diagrams and emergy accounting. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2005. No prelo, disponível em: www.sciencedirect.com desde dezembro de 2004.

GOMIERO, P.; GIAMPIETRO, M. Multiobjective integrated representation (putting in perspective biophysical analyses) applied to aquaculture. In: ULGIATI, S. (Ed.). Advances in Energy Studies, v. 3. Porto Venere, Italy: SGE Editoriali, p. 187-199, 2002a.

_____________. Multiple-scale assessment of farming systems in Uplands Vietnam. In: ULGIATI, S. (Ed.). Advances in Energy Studies, v. 2. Porto Venere, Italy: SGE Editoriali, p. 465-482, 2000b.

HOFSTETTER, P.; BRAUNSCHWEIG A.; METTIER T.; MÜELLER-WENK, R.; TIETJE O. The mixing triangle: Correlation and graphical decision support for LCA-based comparisons. Journal of Industrial Ecology. v. 3, n. 4, p. 97-115, 2000.

JALAL, K. F.; ROGERS, P. P. Measuring environmental performance in Asia. Ecological Indicators v. 2, n. 1, p. 39-59, 2002.

JONSSON, A. Tools and methods for environmental assessment of building products- methodological analysis of six selected approaches. Building and Environment, v. 35, p. 223-238, 2000.

LEFROY, E.; RYDBERG, T. Emergy evaluation of three cropping systems in southwestern Australia. Ecological Modelling, v. 161, n. 3, p. 195-211, 2003.

MARADAN, D.; PILLET, G.; NIEDERHAUSERZINHH, N. Appraising externalities of the Swiss agriculture: a comprehensive view. In: ULGIATI, S. (Ed.). Advances in Energy Studies, v. 2. Porto Venere, Italy: SGE Editoriali, p. 501-512, 2000.

MAXWELL J. et al. Green schemes: corporate environmental strategies and their implementation", California Management Review, v. 39, n. 3, p. 118- 34, 1997.

ODUM, H. T. Environmental Accounting – Emergy and Environmental Decision Making. Nova York: Ed. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 1996.

PANZIERI, M. Analisi ed indagine termodinamica di sistemi complessi. M.Sc. Thesis, 1995. University of Siena, Italy.

PANZIERI, M.; MARCHETTINI, N. HALLAM, T. G. Importance of the Bradhyrizobium japonicum symbiosis for the sustainability of soybean cultivation. Ecological Modeling, v. 135, p. 301-310, 2000.

PORTER, M.; LINDE VAN DER C. Green and Competitive. Harward Business Review, p. 120-134, set-out, 1995a.

_____________. Toward a new conception of the environment competitiveness relantionship, Journal of Economic Perspectives, v. 9, n. 4, p. 97-118, 1995b.

RONCHI, E.; FEDERICO, A.; MUSMECI, F. A system oriented integrated indicatorfor sustainable development in Italy. Ecological Indicators, v. 2, p. 197-210, 2002.

SARKIS, J. "Manufacturing strategy and environmental conciousness". Technovation, v. 15, n. 2, p. 79-97, 1995.

SEPPÄLÄ J.; HÄMÄLÄINEN R. P. On the Meaning of the Distance-to-Target Weighting Method and Normalisation in Life Cycle Impact Assessment. International Journal LCA, v. 6, n. 4, p 211-218, 2001.

SHEN, T. T. Industrial Pollution Prevention, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1995.

SHU-LI, H. Urban ecosystems, energetic hierarchies, and ecological economics of Taipei metropolis. Journal of Environmental Management. v. 52, n. 11, p. 39-51, 1998.

TONON, S. et al. Integration os thermodynamic, economic and environmental parameter for the evaluation of energy systems. In: ULGIATI, S. (Ed.). Advances in Energy Studies, v. 2. Porto Venere, Italy: SGE Editoriali, p. 635-647, 2000.

ULGIATI, S.; BROWN, M. T. Monitoring patterns of sustainability in natural and man-made ecosystems. Ecological Modeling, v. 108, n. 1, p. 23-36, 1998.

_____________. Quantifying the environmental support for dilution and abatement of process emissions – The case of electricity production. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 10, n. 4, p. 335- 348, 2002.

ULGIATI, S. et al. Emergy-based indices and ratios to evaluate the sustainable use of resources. Ecological Engineering, v. 5, n. 4, p. 519-531, 1995.

5883a3ee7f8c9da00c8b46e0 1574685864 Articles
Links & Downloads

Production

Share this page
Page Sections