Production
https://prod.org.br/article/doi/10.1590/0103-6513.225516
Production
Research Article

Self-regulated learning in higher education: strategies adopted by computer programming students when supported by the SimProgramming approach

Pedrosa, Daniela; Cravino, José; Morgado, Leonel; Barreira, Carlos

Downloads: 0
Views: 958

Abstract

The goal of the SimProgramming approach is to help students overcome their learning difficulties in the transition from entry-level to advanced computer programming, developing an appropriate set of learning strategies. We implemented it at the University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (Portugal), in two courses (PM3 and PM4) of the bachelor programmes in Informatics Engineering and ICT. We conducted semi-structured interviews with students (n=38) at the end of the courses, to identify the students’ strategies for self-regulation of learning in the assignment. We found that students changed some of their strategies from one course edition to the following one and that changes are related to the SimProgramming approach. We believe that changes to the educational approach were appropriate to support the assignment goals. We recommend applying the SimProgramming approach in other educational contexts, to improve educational practices by including techniques to help students in their learning.

Keywords

Computer science, Self-regulation of learning, Teaching and learning.

References

Alharbi, A., Henskens, F., & Hannaford, M. (2014). personalised learning object system based on self-regulated learning theories. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 4(3), 24-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v4i3.3348.

Association for Computing Machinery – ACM. IEEE Computer Society – IEEE-CS, 2008. Computer science curriculum 2008: an interim revision of CS 2001 (Computing Curriculum Series). New York: ACM. Retrieved in 14 October 2016, from http://www.acm.org//education/curricula/ComputerScience2008.pdf

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.

Broadbent, J., & Poon, W. L. (2015). Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: a systematic review. The Internet and Higher Education, 27, 1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.04.007.

Cagiltay, N. E. (2007). Teaching software engineering by means of computer-game development: challenges and opportunities. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(3), 405-415. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00705.x.

Cazan, A.-M. (2013). Teaching self regulated learning strategies for psychology students. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 78, 743-747. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.04.387.

Clark, I. (2012). Formative assessment: assessment is for self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 24(2), 205-249. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10648-011-9191-6.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education (7th ed.). London: Routledge-Taylor & Francis Group.

Curry, E., & Grace, P. (2008). Flexible self-management using the model-view-controller pattern. IEEE Software, 25(3), 84-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MS.2008.60.

Falkner, K., Vivian, R., & Falkner, N. J. (2014). Identifying computer science self-regulated learning strategies. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Innovation & Technology in Computer Science Education (pp. 291-296), Uppsala, Sweden. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2591708.2591715.

Fernández, E., Bernardo, A., Suárez, N., Cerezo, R., Núñez, J. C., & Rosário, P. (2013). Predicción del uso de estrategias de autorregulación en educación superior. Anales de Psicología, 29(3), 865-875. http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/analesps.29.3.139341.

Gomes, A. J., & Mendes, A. J. (2015). À procura de um contexto para apoiar a aprendizagem inicial de programação. Educação. Formação & Tecnologias, 8(1), 13-27.

Greene, J. A., & Azevedo, R. (2007). A theoretical review of Winne and Hadwin’s model of self-regulated learning: new perspectives and directions. Review of Educational Research, 77(3), 334-372. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/003465430303953.

Hagenauer, G., & Volet, S. E. (2014). Teacher–student relationship at university: an important yet under-researched field. Oxford Review of Education, 40(3), 370-388. PMid:27226693. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2014.921613.

Hao, Q., Barnes, B., Wright, E., & Branch, R. M. (2016). The influence of achievement goals on online help seeking of computer science students. British Journal of Educational Technology. In press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12499.

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 16-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487.

Karabenick, S. A., & Newman, R. S. (Eds). (2013). Help seeking in academic settings: goals, groups, and contexts. London: Routledge-Taylor & Francis Group.

Kirkwood, A., & Price, L. (2014). Technology-enhanced learning and teaching in higher education: what is “enhanced” and how do we know? A critical literature review. Learning, Media and Technology, 39(1), 6-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2013.770404.

Krasner, G. E., & Pope, S. T. (1988). A description of the model-view-controller user interface paradigm in the Smalltalk-80 System. Journal of Object-Oriented Programming, 1(3), 26-49.

Kumar, B., & Khurana, P. (2012). Gamification in education: learn computer programming with fun. International Journal of Computers and Distributed Systems, 2(1), 46-53.

Kyndt, E., Berghmans, I., Dochy, F., & Bulckens, L. (2014). ‘Time is not enough.’ Workload in higher education: a student perspective. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(4), 684-698. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2013.863839.

Lahtinen, E., Ala-Mutka, K., & Järvinen, H. M. (2005). A study of the difficulties of novice programmers. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 37(3), 14-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1151954.1067453.

Liu, Y., & Phelps, G. (2011). Challenges and professional tools used when teaching web programming. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 26(5), 116-121.

Mega, C., Ronconi, L., & De Beni, R. (2014). What makes a good student? How emotions, self-regulated learning, and motivation contribute to academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(1), 121-131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0033546.

Morgado, L., Fonseca, B., Martins, P., Cruz, G., Maia, A. M., Nunes, R., & Santos, A. (2012). Social networks, microblogging, virtual worlds, and Web 2.0 in the teaching of programming techniques for software engineering: A trial combining collaboration and social interaction beyond college. In Proceedings of the Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) (pp. 1-7), Marrakech, Morocco.

Newman, R. S. (2008). The motivational role of adaptive help seeking in self-regulated learning. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: theory, research, and applications (pp. 315-338). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

Nicol, D., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199-218. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090.

Nunes, R. R., Pedrosa, D., Fonseca, B., Paredes, H., Cravino, J., Morgado, L., & Martins, P. (2015). Enhancing students’ motivation to learn software engineering programming techniques: a collaborative and social interaction approach. In M. Antona & C. Stephanidis (Eds.), Universal access in human-computer interaction: access to learning, health and well-being (pp. 189-201). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

Paasivaara, M., Lassenius, C., Damian, D., Räty, P., & Schröter, A. (2013). Teaching students global software engineering skills using distributed scrum. In Proceedings of the 2013 35th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE) (pp. 1128-1137), San Francisco, CA, USA.

Panadero, E., & Alonso-Tapia, J. (2014). How do students self-regulate? Review of Zimmerman’s cyclical model of self-regulated learning. L’Année Psychologique, 30(2), 450-462.

Panadero, E., & Jonsson, A. (2013). The use of scoring rubrics for formative assessment purposes revisited: a review. Educational Research Review, 9, 129-144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.01.002.

Panadero, E., Jonsson, A., & Strijbos, J. W. (2016). Scaffolding self-regulated learning through self-assessment and peer assessment: guidelines for classroom implementation. In D. Laveault & L. Allal (Eds.), Assessment for learning: meeting the challenge of implementation (pp. 311-326). Springer International Publishing.

Pedrosa, D., Cravino, J., Morgado, L., Barreira, C., Nunes, R. R., Martins, P., & Paredes, H. (2016a). Simprogramming: the development of an integrated teaching approach for computer programming in higher education. In Proceedings of the 10th annual International Technology, Education and Development Conference (INTED 2016), Valencia, Spain.

Pedrosa, D., Cravino, J., Morgado, L., & Barreira, C. (2016b). Self-regulated learning in computer programming: strategies students adopted during an assignment. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Immersive Learning (pp. 87-101), Santa Barbara, CA, USA.

Pedrosa, D., Cravino, J., Morgado, L., & Barreira, C. (2016c). Self-regulated learning in higher education: strategies adopted by computer programming students. In Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Project Approaches in Engineering Education (PAEE), Guimarães, Portugal.

Pintrich, P. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 385-407. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10648-004-0006-x.

Robins, A., Rountree, J., & Rountree, N. (2003). Learning and teaching programming: a review and discussion. Computer Science Education, 13(2), 137-172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1076/csed.13.2.137.14200.

Sancho, P., Moreno-Ger, P., Fuentes-Fernández, R., & Fernández-Manjón, B. (2009). Adaptive role playing games: an immersive approach for problem based learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 110-124.

Sitzmann, T., & Ely, K. (2011). A meta-analysis of self-regulated learning in work-related training and educational attainment: what we know and where we need to go. Psychological Bulletin, 137(3), 421-442. PMid:21401218. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0022777.

Wang, C. H., Shannon, D., & Ross, M. (2013). Students’ characteristics, self-regulated learning, technology self-efficacy, and course outcomes in online learning. Distance Education, 34(3), 302-323. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2013.835779.

Wäschle, K., Allgaier, A., Lachner, A., Fink, S., & Nückles, M. (2014). Procrastination and self-efficacy: tracing vicious and virtuous circles in self-regulated learning. Learning and Instruction, 29, 103-114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.09.005.

Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 166-183. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0002831207312909.

Zimmerman, B. J. (2013). From cognitive modeling to self-regulation: a social cognitive career path. Educational Psychologist, 48(3), 135-147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2013.794676.

Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2007). Motivation: an essential dimension of selfregulated learning. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: theory, research, and applications (pp. 1-30). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

5b86dda10e88251618e4c89d production Articles
Links & Downloads

Production

Share this page
Page Sections