Production
https://prod.org.br/article/doi/10.1590/0103-6513.220516
Production
Research Article

Understanding why women are under-represented in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) within Higher Education: a regional case study

Michael Christie; Maureen O’Neill; Kerry Rutter; Graham Young; Angeline Medland

Downloads: 1
Views: 152

Abstract

Abstract: Participation rates of women in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) is comparatively low and their attrition rates high. An obvious solution is to attract more women to study such subjects. In 2016 the authors undertook research to find out why so few women enrolled in STEM subjects and investigate ways of increasing their recruitment and retention in this area. The informants in our study were enrolled in a tertiary preparation course as well as nursing and education programs. A critique of the literature was used to develop a survey that informed focus group and interview schedules which were used in collecting data. Our study found that many of the factors that hindered women from applying for STEM courses twenty years ago still apply today and recommends actions that can help increase recruitment of women into STEM and assist their retention and graduation in those areas of tertiary education.

Keywords

Diversity in STEM, Sustainability in STEM, Gender Balance

References

Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2001). Australian demographics statistics (cat. no. 3101.0). Canberra: Australian Government.

Australian Council of Learned Academies. (2013). Stem country comparisons: International comparisons of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education: final report. Melbourne: ACOLA.

Boaler, B., & Mckenna, T. (2011). Engaging the disengaged. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: education, knowledge and action research. Geelong: Deakin University Press.

Christie, M., & Nordlund, L. (2006). The quality of assessment: who decides?. In M. Christie (Ed.), Shifting perspectives in engineering education. Gothenburg: CSELT.

Department of Education Science and Training. (2006). Careers and transition: employability skills. Victoria.

Department of Education Science and Training. (2015). Australian maths and science partnerships programme. Victoria. Retrieved in 09 Sept 2016, from https://www.education.gov.au/australian-maths-and-science-partnerships-programme-amspp.

Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: an Introduction to the Philosophy of Education. New York: Macmillan.

DuBois, D. L., & Karcher, M. J. (2011). Handbook of youth mentoring. Washington, DC: Sage Publications.

Eisenhart, M. A., & Finkel, E. (1998). Women’s science: learning and succeeding form the margins. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

Equal Opportunity of Women in the Workplace Agency. (2005). Annual Report 05-06 (pp. 30-35) North Sydney: EOWA.

Fielden, S. L., & Davidson, M. J. (Eds). (2010). International research handbook on successful women entrepreneurs. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Freeman, B. (2004). Women in Engineering Science and Technology: education and career challenges. New York: Engineering Science Reference.

Galton, M., & Blachford, P. (2000). The class size debate. Is small better? Philadelphia: Open University Press.

Glover, J. (2002). Women and scientific employment: current perspectives from the UK. Scientific Studies., 15(1), 29-45.

Green, L. (1997). Music, Gender and Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hanson, S. L. (1996). Lost talent: women in the sciences. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

Huhman, H. R. (2016). STEM fields and the gender gap: where are the women? New York: Forbes. Retrieved in 09 Sept 2016, from http://www.forbes.com/sites/work-inprogress/2012/06/20/stem-fields-and-the-gender-gap-where-are-the-women/#2ead5b3b33a9

Hulme, J. A., & Wilde, J. (2015). Tackling transition in STEM disciplines: supporting the Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) student journey into higher education in England and Wales. York: Higher Education Academy.

Johnson, B. (2003). The first year at university: teaching students in Transition. New York: McGraw Hill.

Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (Eds.). (1988). The action research planner (2nd ed.). Geelong: Deakin University Press.

Lal, B., Yoon, S., & Carlson, K. (1999). How large is the gap in salaries of male and female engineers? Virginia: National Science Foundation. Retrieved in 09 Sept 2016, from http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/srs/issuebrf/sib99352.pdf.

Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. The Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1946.tb02295.x.

McCullough, P. (2004). Physics Education Research Conference. Sacramento: American Institute of Physics.

McNiff, J. (2013). Action research: principles and practice (3rd ed.). Abington: Routledge.

Mezirow. (1991) Transformative dimensions of adult learning. Chichester: Wiley.

Morley, L., & Lugg, R. (2009). Mapping Meritocracy: intersecting gender, poverty and higher educational opportunity structures. Higher Education Policy, 22(1), 37-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/hep.2008.26.

National Centre for Education Statistics. (1997). Women in mathematics and science (Findings from the Condition of Education, 11, pp. 14-20, NCES 97-982). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

National Centre for Education Statistics. (2013). STEM Attrition: college students’ paths into and out of STEM fields: statistical analysis report (NCES 2014-001). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

National Science Board. (2010). Higher education in science and engineering. In Science and Engineering Indicators 2010. (Chap. 2, pp. 2-41, NSB 10-01). Arlington: National Science Foundation.

National Science Foundation. (2004). Science and engineering indicators 2004 (Vol. 1, NSB 04-1). Arlington: National Science Foundation.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2014). Fostering equity in higher education compendium of practical case studies: promoting female participation in STEM. Paris: OECD.

Probert, B. (2005). I just couldn’t fit it in: gender and unequal outcomes in academic careers. Gender, Work and Organization, 12(1), 50-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2005.00262.x.

Roberts, P., & Arye, M. (2002). Counting the losses…….The Careers Review of Engineering Women: an investigation of women’s retention in the Australian engineering workforce. The National Women in Engineering Committee.

Rowley, J., & Hartley, R. (2008). Organizing knowledge. Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing.

Strachan, G., Whitehouse, G., Peetz, D., Bailey, J., & Broadbent, K. (2008). Gender equity in universities: should we be worried? Gender and Education, 11(3), 323-342.

The House of Lords Science and Technology Committee. (2012). Behaviour change. London: The Stationery Office Limited.

Thomas, G. (2014). Closing the policy-practice gap for low-SES students in higher education: the pedagogical challenge. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(4), 807-820. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2013.863846.

Tobbell, J., O’Donnell, V. L., & Zammit, M. (2014). Exploring transition to postgraduate study: shifting identities in interaction with communities, practice and participation. British Educational Research Journal, 36(2), 261-278. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01411920902836360.

Wakeling, P., & Hampden-Thompson, G. (2013). Transition to higher degrees across the UK: an analysis of national, institutional and individual differences. York: Higher Education Academy.

Wallace, N., & Sheldon, M. (2014). Enhancing career pathways. Australia: Springer.

West, P., Sweeting, H., & Young, P. (2010). Transitions matters: pupil’s experiences of the primary-secondary transition in the West of Scotland and consequences for wellbeing and attainment. Research Papers in Education, 25(1), 21-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02671520802308677.

Whitehead, J., & McNiff, J. (2006). Action Research: Living Theory. New York: Sage.

Yorke, A., & Longden, M. (2008). How to Recruit and Retain Higher Education Students: A Handbook of Good Practice. New York: Routledge.
 

58ff8c9b0e8825576fabdcf5 production Articles
Links & Downloads

Production

Share this page
Page Sections