Research Article

What are the key determinants of maintenance performance?

Soroush Avakh Darestani; Mandana Ganji; Rana Imannezhad

Downloads: 1
Views: 734


Abstract: Paper aims: The main objective of the research is to present a combination of fuzzy decision-making techniques to measure the performance of preventive maintenance systems.

Originality: This research is a timely response to studying the prominent role of preventive maintenance performance in reducing cost, profitability, and overall organization’s output.

Research method: This study considers the application of “fuzzy DEMATEL” and ANP techniques for measuring maintenance performance and determining the causal relationships between the criteria and sub-criteria.

Main findings: It is conjectured that functional and technical criteria, along that with individual and the environmental are of great importance. Among the sub-criteria, employee satisfaction, growth and learning, availability of machinery and equipment, quality of maintenance by the skilled and highly-trained workforce, deem to be the most important ones.

Implications for theory and practice: The application of the decision techniques and the proposed measurement model for continuous improvement and promotion of maintenance performance.


Maintenance, PM Performance Measurement, Fuzzy DEMATEL Technique, Fuzzy Network Analysis (ANP), Multi-criteria Decision Making


Abdulgader, F. S., Eid, R., & Rouyendegh, B. D. (2018). Development of decision support model for selecting a maintenance plan using a fuzzy mcdm approach – A theoretical framework. Applied Computational Intelligence and Soft Computing, 2018, 1-14.

Amrina, E., Yulianto, A., & Kamil, I. (2019). Fuzzy multi criteria approach for sustainable maintenance evaluation in rubber industry, 16th Global Conference on Sustainable Manufacturing – Sustainable Manufacturing for Global Circular Economy, Procedia Manufacturing, 33, 538-545.

Brah, S. A., & Chong, W. K. (2004). Relationship between total productive maintenance and performance. International Journal of Production Research, 42(12), 2383-2401.

Can Özcan, E., Ünlüsoy, S., & Tamer, E. (2017). A combined goal programming – AHP approach supported with TOPSIS for maintenance strategy selection in hydroelectric power plants. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 78, 1410-1423.

Cruz, A. M., & Haugan, G. L. (2019). Determinants of maintenance performance: A resource-based view and agency theory approach. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 51, 33-47.

Duffuaa, S., & Raouf, A. (2015). Planning and control of maintenance systems: Modelling and analysis. Berlin: Springer International Publishing.

Fekri Sari, M., & Avakh Darestani, S. (2019). Fuzzy overall equipment effectiveness and line performance measurement using artificial neural network. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 25(2), 340-354.

Gandhare, B. S., & Akarte, M. (2012, January 1-4), Maintenance strategy selection. In Ninth AIMS International Conference on Management (pp. 1330-1336). Maharashtra, India: AIMS International.

Haj Shirmohammadi, A. (1998). Total Productive Maintenance (TPM) (1st ed.). Esfahan: Arkan Publications.

Hemmati, N., Rahiminezhad Galankashi, M., Imani, D., & Farughi, H. (2018), Maintenance policy selection: A Fuzzy-ANP spproach, Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 29(7), 1253-1268.

Jain, K., Singh Jain, S., & Singh Chauhan, M. (2013). Selection of optimum maintenance and rehabilitation strategy for multiline highways. IJTTE. International Journal for Traffic and Transport Engineering, 3(3), 269-278.

Khompatraporn, C., & Somboonwiwat, T. (2017). Causal factor relations of supply chain competitiveness via fuzzy DEMATEL method for Thai automotive industry. Production Planning and Control, 28(6-8), 538-551.

Lin, C. T., Lee, C., & Wu, C. S. (2009). Optimizing a marketing expert decision process for the private hotel. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(3), 5613-5619.

Murthy, D. N. P., Atrens, A., & Eccleston, J. A. (2002). Strategic Maintenance Management. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 8(4), 287-305.

Muchiri, P. N., Pintelon, L., Martin, H., & De Meyer, A. M. (2010). Empirical analysis of maintenance performance measurement in Belgian Industries. International Journal of Production Research, 48(20), 5905-5924.

Maletič, D., Maletič, M., & Gomišček, B. (2014). The Impact of quality management orientation on maintenance performance. International Journal of Production Research, 52(6), 1744-1754.

Noori, A. (2004). Reliability-centered maintenance. In 7th Railway Transportation Conference. Tehran, Iran: Sharif University of Technology, Civil Engineering. Retrieved in 2004, April 28, from

Oliveira, M., Lopes, I., & Rodrigues, C. (2016). Use of maintenance performance indicators by companies of the industrial hub of Manaus. Procedia CIRP, 52, 157-160.

Raufi, M. (2009), Professional interactions, duties, and activities of maintenance engineering, The First National Conference on Engineering and Management of Infrastructures. Iran: Tehran University.

Rouyendegh, B. D., Topuz K., Dag, A., & Oztekin, A. (2018), An AHP-IFT Integrated Model for Performance Evaluation of E-commerce Web Sites. Information Systems Journal, 21, 1345-1355.

Saaty, T. L. (1996). Decision making with dependence and feedback: The analytic network process (Vol. 4922). Pittsburgh: RWS Publications.

Sari, E., Shaharoun, A. M., Ma’aram, A., & Yazid, A. M. (2015). Sustainable Maintenance Performance Measures: A pilot survey in Malaysian Automotive Companies. Procedia CIRP, 26, 443-448.

Separi, F., & Asadi Kiapey, M. B. (2012), Reliability-centered maintenance strategy based on the AHP in distribution networks, 25th International Power System Conference. Teerã: Tavanir Company, Niroo Research Institute.

Tsang, A. H. C. (2002). Strategic dimensions of maintenance management. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 8(1), 7-39.

Tadić, S., Zečević, S., & Krstić, M. (2014). A novel hybrid MCDM model based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy VIKOR for city logistics concept selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(18), 8112-8128.

Vinodh, S., Sai Balagi, T. S., & Patil, A. (2016). A hybrid MCDM approach for agile concept selection using fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 83(9-12), 1979-1987.

Yang, J. B., Wang, Y. M., Xu, D. L., & Chin, K. S. (2006). The Evidential Reasoning Approach for MADA under both Probabilistic and Fuzzy Uncertainties. European Journal of Operational Research, 171(1), 309-343.

Zaim, S., Turkyılmaz, A., Acar, F., Al-Turki, U., & Demirel, O. F. (2012). Maintenance strategy selection using AHP and ANP algorithms: A case study. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 18(1), 16-29.

Submitted date:

Accepted date:

5f90384d0e88253e5c1ddb37 production Articles
Links & Downloads


Share this page
Page Sections