Research Article

Writing the literature review for empirical papers

Nakano, Davi; Muniz Jr., Jorge

Downloads: 0
Views: 550


Paper aims: The purpose of the paper is to offer guidance regarding how to write a Literature Review for empirical papers, that provides adequate background and convincing support. The literature review plays the fundamental role of unveiling the theory, or theories, that underpin the paper argument, sets its limits, and defines and clarifies the main concepts that will be used in the empirical sections of the text.
Originality: Most papers and books focus on literature review as full articles (systematic reviews, meta analyses and critical analyses) or dissertation, chapters, this paper is focused on literature review for an empirical article.
Research method: It is a theoretical essay.
Main findings: The paper summarizes the main steps for performing a literature review and guides how to organize the analyzed literature.
Implications for theory and practice: Well-crafted literature reviews are the cornerstone of good papers, and this paper offers some guidance on how to write good reviews for empirical papers, and, as a consequence, to produce better quality texts.


Literature review, Metanalyses, Critical analyses, Empirical paper.


Abbariki, M., Snell, R. S., & Easterby-Smith, M. (2017). Sharing or ignoring tacit knowledge? A comparison of collective learning routines at two sites. Journal of General Management, 42(5), 57-67.

Anderson, J. C., Cleveland, G., & Schroeder, R. G. (1989). Operations strategy: a literature review. Journal of Operations Management, 8(2), 133-158.

Boer, H., Holweg, M., Kilduff, M., Pagell, M., Schmenner, R., & Voss, C. (2015). Making a meaningful contribution to theory. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 35(9), 1231-1252.

Boote, D. N., & Beile, P. (2005). Scholars before researchers: on the centrality of the dissertation literature review in research preparation. Educational Researcher, 34(6), 3-15.

Burgess, K., Singh, P. J., & Koroglu, R. (2006). Supply chain management: a structured literature review and implications for future research. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 26(7), 703-729.

Easterby-Smith, M., Thorpe, R., & Jackson, P. R. (2012). Management research. London: Sage.

Fink, A. (1998). Conducting research literature review: from paper to the internet. London: Sage.

Hart, C. (1998). Doing a literature review. London: Sage Publications.

Higgins, J. P. T., & Green, S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, version 5.1.0. 2011. Retrieved in 2017, December 4, from

Kitchenham, B., Pearl Brereton, O., Budgen, D., Turner, M., Bailey, J., & Linkman, S. (2009). Systematic literature reviews in software engineering: a systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 51(1), 7-15.

Locke, K., & Golden-Biddle, K. (1997). Constructing opportunities for contribution. Academy of Management Journal, 40(5), 1023-1062.

Mills, J., Schmitz, J., & Frizelle, G. (2004). A strategic review of “supply networks”. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 24(10), 1012-1036.

Ngai, E. W. T., Moon, K. K. L., Riggins, F. J., & Yi, C. Y. (2008). RFID research: an academic literature review (1995-2005) and future research directions. International Journal of Production Economics, 12(2), 510-520.

Nonaka, I., & Peltokorpi, V. (2006). Objectivity and subjectivity in knowledge management: a review of 20 top articles. Knowledge and Process Management, 13(2), 73-82.

Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autioa, E., Broströmc, A., D’Este, P., Finif, R., Geuna, A., Grimaldif, R., Hughes, A., Krabel, S., Kitsong, M., Llerenai, P., Lissoni, F., Salter, A., & Sobrerof, M. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: a review of the literature on university–industry relations. Research Policy, 42(2), 423-442.

Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide. Malden MA: Blackwell.

Popay, J., Roberts, H., Sowden, A., Petticrew, M., Arai, L., Rodgers, M., & Duffy, S. (2006). Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews. A product from the ESRC methods programme Version, 1, b92. Retrieved in 2017, July 9, from synthesis-in-systematic-reviews-A-product-from-the-ESRC-Methods-Programme.pdf

Popay, J., Rogers, A., & Williams, G. (1998). Rationale and standards for the systematic review of qualitative literature in health services research. Qualitative Health Research, 8(3), 341-351. PMID: 10558335.

Rochet, J., & Tirole, J. (2006). Two-sided markets: a progress report. The RAND Journal of Economics, 37(3), 645-667.

Serenko, A., & Bontis, N. (2004). Meta-review of knowledge management and intellectual capital literature: citation impact and research productivity ranking. Knowledge and Process Management, 11(3), 185-198.

Shamseer, L., Moher, D., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., & Stewart, L. A. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.), 349, g7647. PMid:25555855.

Sutton, R. I., & Staw, B. M. (1995). The relationship between integrating sphere and diffusion theory calculations of fluence rate at the wall of a spherical cavity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(3), 1-12. PMid:7708833.

Thomé, A. M. T., Scavarda, L. F., & Scavarda, A. J. (2016). Conducting systematic literature review in operations management. Production Planning and Control, 27(5), 408-420.

Torraco, R. J. (2005). Writing integrative literature reviews: guidelines and examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4(3), 356-367.

Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207-222.

Whetten, D. (2003). O que constitui uma contribuição teórica?. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 43(3), 69-73.

5b86eaad0e88258c26e4c89d production Articles
Links & Downloads


Share this page
Page Sections