Lecture capture and learner engagement strategies for industrial engineering distance education: results of a pilot program
Brooks, C., Erickson, G., Greer, J., & Gutwin, C. (2014). Modeling and quantifying the behaviours of students in lecture capture environments.
Bryson, C., & Hand, L. (2007). The role of engagement in inspiring teaching and learning.
Chickering, A. W., & Ehrmann, S. C. (1996). Implementing the seven principles: technology as lever.
Clark, C., Strudler, N., & Grove, K. (2015). Comparing asynchronous and synchronous video vs. text based discussions in an online teacher education course.
Davis, S., Connolly, A., & Linfield, E. (2009). Lecture capture: making the most of face-to-face learning.
Dixson, M. D. (2015). Measuring student engagement in the online course: the online student engagement scale (OSE). Online Learning,
Elliott, C., & Neal, D. (2016). Evaluating the use of lecture capture using a revealed preference approach.
Euzent, P., Martin, T., Moskal, P., & Moskal, P. (2011). Assessing student performance and perceptions in lecture capture vs. face-to-face course delivery.
Evans, C. (2008). The effectiveness of m-learning in the form of podcast revision lectures in higher education.
Fitze, M. (2006). Discourse and participation in ESL face-to-face and written electronic conferences.
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (1999). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: computer conferencing in higher education.
Giesbers, B., Rienties, B., Tempelaar, D., & Gijselaers, W. (2014). A dynamic analysis of the interplay between asynchronous and synchronous communication in online learning: the impact of motivation.
Grant, M. R., & Thornton, H. R. (2007). Best practices in undergraduate adult-centered online learning: mechanisms for course design and delivery.
Handelsman, M. M., Briggs, W. L., Sullivan, N., & Towler, A. (2005). A measure of college student course engagement.
Joksimović, S., Gašević, D., Kovanović, V., Riecke, B. E., & Hatala, M. (2015). Social presence in online discussions as a process predictor of academic performance.
Kearsley, G., & Shneiderman, B. (1998). Engagement theory: a framework for technology-based teaching and learning.
Larreamendy-Joerns, J., & Leinhardt, G. (2006). Going the distance with online education.
Marchand, J.-P., Pearson, M. L., & Albon, S. P. (2014). Student and faculty member perspectives on lecture capture in pharmacy education.
Muniz Junior, J., Rodrigues, J. S., Assis, A., Oliveira, F. C. P., Franco, B. C., & Maciel, F. G. (2017). Increasing students’ skills in operations management classes: Cumbuca Method as teaching-learning strategy.
Newton, G., Tucker, T., Dawson, J., & Currie, E. (2014). Use of lecture capture in higher education: lessons from the trenches.
Oomen-Early, J., Bold, M., Wiginton, K. L., Gallien, T. L., & Anderson, N. (2008). Using asynchronous audio communication (AAC) in the online classroom: a comparative study.
Owston, R., Lupshenyuk, H., & Wideman, H. (2011). Lecture capture in large undergraduate classes: student perceptions and academic performance.
Roberts, J. C. (2015). Evaluating the effectiveness of lecture capture: lessons learned from an undergraduate political research class.
Savery, J. R. (2005). Be vocal: characteristics of successful online instructors.
Schreiner, L. A., & Louis, M. (2011). The engaged learning index: Implications for faculty development.
Sweeten, T. L. (2015). Interactive videoconferencing versus the face-to-face biology classroom: understanding student attitudes and behavior. In A. Blackstock & N. Straight (Eds.),
Traphagan, T., Kucsera, J. V., & Kishi, K. (2010). Impact of class lecture webcasting on attendance and learning.