Production
https://prod.org.br/article/doi/10.1590/0103-6513.20170078
Production
Research Article

Lecture capture and learner engagement strategies for industrial engineering distance education: results of a pilot program

Jenner, Alicia; Helwig, Michael; Ruffer, Arlette

Downloads: 0
Views: 415

Abstract

Abstract: Paper aims: This study examines issues affecting the efficacy of online course delivery using lecture capture technology. This form of instruction presents particular challenges when classes are comprised of a mix of students who participate synchronously and asynchronously.

Originality: The study examines a pilot program focused on improving the delivery of lecture capture courses, providing a framework for the implementation of similar programs at other institutions.

Research method: Program feedback as to the quality of the learning experience is obtained from the instructor, as well as from both synchronous and asynchronous online learners.

Main findings: The results provide insights into how students engage with the instructor and with one another in a lecture capture setting. Effective instructional practices are also identified.

Implications for theory and practice: The results provide important insights that can enhance the delivery of courses utilizing lecture capture technology across a range of educational contexts.

Keywords

Lecture capture, Distance education, Learner engagement

References

Brooks, C., Erickson, G., Greer, J., & Gutwin, C. (2014). Modeling and quantifying the behaviours of students in lecture capture environments. Computers & Education , 75, 282-292. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.03.002.

Bryson, C., & Hand, L. (2007). The role of engagement in inspiring teaching and learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44(4), 349-362. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14703290701602748.

Chickering, A. W., & Ehrmann, S. C. (1996). Implementing the seven principles: technology as lever. AAHE Bulletin, 49, 3-6.

Clark, C., Strudler, N., & Grove, K. (2015). Comparing asynchronous and synchronous video vs. text based discussions in an online teacher education course. Online Learning , 19(3), 48-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v19i3.510.

Davis, S., Connolly, A., & Linfield, E. (2009). Lecture capture: making the most of face-to-face learning. Engineering Education, 4(2), 4-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.11120/ened.2009.04020004.

Dixson, M. D. (2015). Measuring student engagement in the online course: the online student engagement scale (OSE). Online Learning, 19(4), 1-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v19i4.561.

Elliott, C., & Neal, D. (2016). Evaluating the use of lecture capture using a revealed preference approach. Active Learning in Higher Education, 17(2), 153-167. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1469787416637463.

Euzent, P., Martin, T., Moskal, P., & Moskal, P. (2011). Assessing student performance and perceptions in lecture capture vs. face-to-face course delivery. Journal of Information Technology Education, 10(1), 295-307. http://dx.doi.org/10.28945/1515.

Evans, C. (2008). The effectiveness of m-learning in the form of podcast revision lectures in higher education. Computers & Education, 50(2), 491-498. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.09.016.

Fitze, M. (2006). Discourse and participation in ESL face-to-face and written electronic conferences. Language Learning & Technology, 10(1), 67-86.

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (1999). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education , 2(2), 87-105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6.

Giesbers, B., Rienties, B., Tempelaar, D., & Gijselaers, W. (2014). A dynamic analysis of the interplay between asynchronous and synchronous communication in online learning: the impact of motivation. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30(1), 30-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12020.

Grant, M. R., & Thornton, H. R. (2007). Best practices in undergraduate adult-centered online learning: mechanisms for course design and delivery. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 3(4), 346-356.

Handelsman, M. M., Briggs, W. L., Sullivan, N., & Towler, A. (2005). A measure of college student course engagement. The Journal of Educational Research, 98(3), 184-191. http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/JOER.98.3.184-192.

Joksimović, S., Gašević, D., Kovanović, V., Riecke, B. E., & Hatala, M. (2015). Social presence in online discussions as a process predictor of academic performance. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(6), 638-654. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12107.

Kearsley, G., & Shneiderman, B. (1998). Engagement theory: a framework for technology-based teaching and learning. Educational Technology, 58(5), 20-24.

Larreamendy-Joerns, J., & Leinhardt, G. (2006). Going the distance with online education. Review of Educational Research, 76(4), 567-605. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543076004567.

Marchand, J.-P., Pearson, M. L., & Albon, S. P. (2014). Student and faculty member perspectives on lecture capture in pharmacy education. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education , 78(4), 74. http://dx.doi.org/10.5688/ajpe78474. PMid:24850936.

Muniz Junior, J., Rodrigues, J. S., Assis, A., Oliveira, F. C. P., Franco, B. C., & Maciel, F. G. (2017). Increasing students’ skills in operations management classes: Cumbuca Method as teaching-learning strategy. Gestão & Produção , 24(4), 680-689. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0104-530x1172-15.

Newton, G., Tucker, T., Dawson, J., & Currie, E. (2014). Use of lecture capture in higher education: lessons from the trenches. TechTrends, 58(2), 32-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11528-014-0735-8.

Oomen-Early, J., Bold, M., Wiginton, K. L., Gallien, T. L., & Anderson, N. (2008). Using asynchronous audio communication (AAC) in the online classroom: a comparative study. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching / MERLOT, 4(3), 267-276.

Owston, R., Lupshenyuk, H., & Wideman, H. (2011). Lecture capture in large undergraduate classes: student perceptions and academic performance. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(4), 262-268. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.05.006.

Roberts, J. C. (2015). Evaluating the effectiveness of lecture capture: lessons learned from an undergraduate political research class. Journal of Political Science Education , 11(1), 45-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15512169.2014.985104.

Savery, J. R. (2005). Be vocal: characteristics of successful online instructors. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 4(2), 141-152.

Schreiner, L. A., & Louis, M. (2011). The engaged learning index: Implications for faculty development. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 22(1), 5-28.

Sweeten, T. L. (2015). Interactive videoconferencing versus the face-to-face biology classroom: understanding student attitudes and behavior. In A. Blackstock & N. Straight (Eds.), Interdisciplinary approaches to distance teaching: connecting classrooms in theory and practice (pp. 39-51). New York: Routledge.

Traphagan, T., Kucsera, J. V., & Kishi, K. (2010). Impact of class lecture webcasting on attendance and learning. Educational Technology Research and Development , 58(1), 19-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11423-009-9128-7.
 

5b86ecfe0e88256429e4c89d production Articles
Links & Downloads

Production

Share this page
Page Sections